Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386

Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-28T19:42:54Z

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:31:33PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:
>
> > It would probably be better implemented with a more generic mechanism,
> > but I don't believe anyone is working on that now, so it looks like AFS
> > will continue to use a special syscall.
>
> We could put an #ifdef CONFIG_AFS into the syscall table definition?
> That makes it explicit.

No. AFS is utterly wrong, and the sooner we make it fail to work the better.