Re: [PATCH] Read only syscall tables for x86_64 and i386

Christoph Lameter
2005-06-28T19:32:39Z

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote:

> It would probably be better implemented with a more generic mechanism,
> but I don't believe anyone is working on that now, so it looks like AFS
> will continue to use a special syscall.

We could put an #ifdef CONFIG_AFS into the syscall table definition?
That makes it explicit.