From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267411AbUBSXc1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:32:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267419AbUBSXc1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:32:27 -0500 Received: from q.bofh.de ([212.126.220.202]:2065 "EHLO q.bofh.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267411AbUBSXc0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2004 18:32:26 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.25-rc4 Mail-Copies-To: nobody From: Hilko Bengen In-Reply-To: (Marcelo Tosatti's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:39:39 -0300 (BRT)") References: <8765e4rydf.fsf@hilluzination.de> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:28:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87vfm2ps2w.fsf@hilluzination.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti writes: >> Ok, the bug has been there for ages and, being an ISA card, the >> I-Surf is probably not used that much any more... Was there >> anything wrong with the patch I sent? > > I dont think so. I will be in 2.4.26-pre1 Thanks. There was also another patch which I posted earlier to this list. It fixes an issue with iomem being displayed wrong in /proc/isapnp output. I found this when trying to debug the isurf issue. Please include that also. -Hilko diff -uir orig/linux-2.4.23/drivers/pnp/isapnp_proc.c linux-2.4.24/drivers/pnp/isapnp_proc.c --- orig/linux-2.4.23/drivers/pnp/isapnp_proc.c 2002-11-29 00:53:14.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.4.24/drivers/pnp/isapnp_proc.c 2004-02-06 14:56:45.000000000 +0100 @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ if (next) isapnp_printf(buffer, "\n"); for (i = next = 0; i < 4; i++) { - tmp = isapnp_read_dword(ISAPNP_CFG_MEM + (i << 3)); + tmp = isapnp_read_word(ISAPNP_CFG_MEM + (i << 3)) << 8; if (!tmp) continue; if (!next) {