From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-244108.protonmail.ch (mail-244108.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301584534BB for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785934746; cv=none; b=X/IVU5i0SRIrLwh5lQ4Jxbw/rd6hcHL8ZUr1XsqEtL/nEFqi86KVQqUv0x4LuXtK0t340cOm6PnT+ttawyNQeQgk3ap36OdadRaHM0vhS9E7bME2NsOAu4vPHRWu4HQu4aaAPM7ubazszZLZaci3xaIhAPP92EKPDgotS7K62yo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785934746; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5CHT89h5pXRG3aFQ5eEOuJMYrdQuBFF+YsLM7b0jO5w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PpXnO6JOO50ecKX3JJmovuQMl4L3H0PWHv27tvuHGus3cvYNIJzmU6pHffwDWOGc0v8slda0SsJEn69GqUtvCl/O+9B+oKBvDMSXrLm82AQ6uVaHmmAP10F2fIYb+CWJ/ohld8e9NwJC+AQqP7K3NLI1dIdh4yDoAF7dpSTmFV4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b=RtMSpAvt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=109.224.244.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=geanix.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=geanix.com header.i=@geanix.com header.b="RtMSpAvt" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=geanix.com; s=protonmail3; t=1785934740; x=1786193940; bh=5CHT89h5pXRG3aFQ5eEOuJMYrdQuBFF+YsLM7b0jO5w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:From:To: Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=RtMSpAvtzmWYSgSolkSkmqnZqVubGIPWD29P81Byd/3KAr7ehRouugD7LYK2nNhv4 MrMiifoXXjL0ZKqiHWoJAN1a/OTQ/4kb5C2U78Mm64ZCqhxHjuZsdzGzxpCKBT7L7P XgZ5wyOulBWfdupmT4RHcpRNSZ1xGOS5vZD5uhZ+e9CH1KpJx5WAXnngjPzGyHKgFe HvMFIfVwSdhRl8A1QKbqYxi/HgdmyuU1jXzXMKGhipTreYDGgm98swWZqfM48fqOXT ffhoQ9WTPbvALa1KmUv+gKsKj9pjhYYolF/6OJqf1Zz1DqYLIFtleM0O856Is+WG7z w8jY32wkRAkjQ== X-Pm-Submission-Id: 4hFVpn6LCMz2ScQM From: Esben Haabendal To: "Luca Ceresoli" Cc: "Andrzej Hajda" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Robert Foss" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "David Airlie" , "Simona Vetter" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] drm/bridge: nwl-dsi: Add error handling of nwl_dsi_mode_set() In-Reply-To: <178591896150.480618.7817290661302611456.b4-review@b4> (Luca Ceresoli's message of "Wed, 05 Aug 2026 10:36:01 +0200") References: <20260803-nwl-dsi-fixes-v2-0-1809a0ac453f@geanix.com> <20260803-nwl-dsi-fixes-v2-4-1809a0ac453f@geanix.com> <178591896150.480618.7817290661302611456.b4-review@b4> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 14:58:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87wlu4afla.fsf@geanix.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Luca Ceresoli" writes: > On Mon, 03 Aug 2026 16:56:22 +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote: >> There does not seem to be any good reasons for ignoring the return value of >> the nwl_dsi_mode_set() function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal > > Here too, if it's a fix it needs Fixes: + Cc: stable. Added for v3. /Esben