From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A17136D4E4; Wed, 13 May 2026 12:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778677062; cv=none; b=bNAwhxBWSujwvKp1ZZyjfd/6QfZyOAvctEQvEcZySl2AP4bPt9vmr7C+RigzKH5HwNgoz20xv5dwvZ+QBkf4FrZZJYMrB+u75QYpD/gtpzmQWj6CM80bpRw9FUmRtD02ib3AKHlEdO2haCbxVmMbvLh6+iSlCY45yPelZhfv+34= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778677062; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lgKLUMReZlkJVnwJxFYAv74XGD7vVCHGZVXTfs65Qa8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BaH8pRnSHe0mz4MtUyMFdC2O6WKEiAtOBUqCZPvPrVS8lobQG/j1Nd82npLe1fav+jEXd792JKtO/R6i1NF0RaXMOQTABSrAineCuUdG8CqrtOWPCIJ+yA6BWYUs4hsh6M3nnDz9mf6QZQrbFeQKCJwr1LpCvajAHQoatRirv4g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=b0Pn3Xpu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="b0Pn3Xpu" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EEABC2BCB7; Wed, 13 May 2026 12:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1778677061; bh=lgKLUMReZlkJVnwJxFYAv74XGD7vVCHGZVXTfs65Qa8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=b0Pn3XpuZg23jIkbHo0OfOHaMz1KojnyHGQHu2sFS/+dvU7dxMhfRu8ONJz/vWi8x gskYh193yof5zXc0yg5pb9zutE/fDJ/47nv/cFYDJuSJTm/YB2M+aB9HRK4dS2b93l oDO0K/dq9PDXAxT3jA/VUy9s6fwHZ3EsbJSJCfD9pct70Z+LZ+ZQZyvOpT6r+g+cT5 CCK9qGiztx8FD5Ri9L2aatytEOm4oyr8oTHIot8kQmHfukH53f0YEkmzh16Tkng3mA wAoQr5SJ4S7gaOBBirBcc+8MHc0zsZWTJR56iPrKhqYZyP7XN1FbSp7t3pLGkN8Fus xTVAFkYbnwN0A== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Dan Carpenter Cc: LKML , Calvin Owens , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Frederic Weisbecker , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , John Stultz , Stephen Boyd , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , Florian Westphal , Phil Sutter , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org Subject: Re: [patch V2 01/11] hrtimer: Provide hrtimer_start_range_ns_user() In-Reply-To: References: <20260408102356.783133335@kernel.org> <20260408114951.995031895@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 14:57:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87wlx779h9.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, May 12 2026 at 11:06, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 01:53:46PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> +enum { >> + HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_NONE, >> + HRTIMER_REPROGRAM, >> + HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_FORCE, >> +}; >> + >> static bool __hrtimer_start_range_ns(struct hrtimer *timer, ktime_t tim, u64 delta_ns, >> const enum hrtimer_mode mode, struct hrtimer_clock_base *base) > > The return type for this function needs to changed from bool to > enum whatever... Otherwise HRTIMER_REPROGRAM and HRTIMER_REPROGRAM_FORCE > are both just true. Duh, yes.