From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vdso: Define NSEC_PER_SEC as 64-bit to prevent overflow
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 10:03:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wm7bbo3c.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOcRiAFzN61FE=By1ANB3aK4PKVTBQAzrCcfoHfHwMX7Qn8wYA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 09 2025 at 17:49, Wake Liu wrote:
Please do not top post and trim your replies.
> CLOCK_REALTIME ABSTIME PERIODIC timer fired early: 1 : [FAILED]
> Looks like there is some integer overflow on 32 bit builds in the
> timespec_sub function:
>
> long long timespec_sub(struct timespec a, struct timespec b)
That's in selftests and not in the kernel VDSO code.
Can you please be precise with your subject and changelog? You claimed:
"This can lead to incorrect time calculations within the VDSO"
No, it can't not because the VDSO does not use it that way.
> {
> long long ret = NSEC_PER_SEC * b.tv_sec + b.tv_nsec;
>
> ret -= NSEC_PER_SEC * a.tv_sec + a.tv_nsec;
> return ret;
> }
>
> on 32 bit builds NSEC_PER_SEC and b.tv_sec are only 32 bit values
> which I'm guessing is causing the overflow.
Guessing is not a valid technical problem solving approach.
> NSEC_PER_SEC is defined as 1000000000L but if we change this to
> 1000000000LL then the test starts passing.
Yes, that function bogus on 32bit.
There are at least ten different ways to implement this function 32-bit
safe, but you picked the worst option of all, which breaks the kernel
build as you got told by 0-day.
I'm sure you can figure out how to ensure that the multiplication is
actually expanding to 64-bit or use some other approach to calculate
that delta.
And please make that an inline function and put it into a header file in
the timer selftest directory, and replace _all_ copies of it in the
various timer tests.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-10 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-05 16:21 [PATCH] vdso: Define NSEC_PER_SEC as 64-bit to prevent overflow Wake Liu
2025-08-06 8:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-06 8:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-09 9:49 ` Wake Liu
2025-08-10 8:03 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-08-10 8:28 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-09-15 19:19 ` [PATCH v2] selftests/timers: Consolidate and fix 32-bit overflow in timespec_sub Wake Liu
2025-09-21 7:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-01-07 23:19 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-06 20:28 ` [PATCH] vdso: Define NSEC_PER_SEC as 64-bit to prevent overflow kernel test robot
2025-08-07 7:37 ` kernel test robot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-08-05 16:20 Wake Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wm7bbo3c.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=wakel@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox