From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8288F180A6A; Tue, 14 May 2024 21:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715722439; cv=none; b=k0ouw1ExQVOCCoA2W/Y/WL8KeiTWnDC3D6MzdukkwtOsGmDSjWAlTBmwKC0wCWdprftCK4Rsw3sjEGoHYj/4wlN28LE9tGKwI3KmmS9dcsZ+lH28hizrYwVD+CVIdRXKp/CW3PpyM+O+9wIJuLdnu/aom6tBHn38eJu2ys0a7CM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715722439; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gQ3cHLBfriWESqMJX8RI6EYiieJnzdTF2TB9WXr93Jo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=txqUbAI/Mbm3RW2NMjjHXR5n3gEWUVjY22PgAuEVQtH9HSRhjLFLF5F3JNvwheG9qwSoyiQfSvihqmrqIggNxhAOvvlzbj3mzolMVn1z9MwtfbOc7R1UpsXHwmtlnaMjDcDPYdX0hC+ltXxN/hGPLwG+dzDjKclJK7Ce3N4A3SY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=PV/6XtIo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="PV/6XtIo" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 85E7A47C5E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1715722433; bh=PLi46UaVrc/Z0uoODzowFmJDuvciXUyoO6N2acvXiQU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=PV/6XtIoIwbywu9v9hI5qfTogTxnTYW8Hli6HSI20avtrV/HAlxaBmBFp4ZnUmtTR jH3WSYrzaZTF5067Ql5OxTiz5iZoKTPL4Efu2tFv9LyT7l12A3ZHXituz1yhyT9pUT AX9DeXWJ5tJjc0ZyTn/FUeU4LIxk66NoaPTyjpP3ZqqDBsxTidsOnmt9+DSODBWXnM jH2eRiwlWKKzQpgd3BRCcniLKNmg+QsN6yX8FO2hJfrRMJRJGufaFFAP7CSZwT5x0p BpHAlVhBrpihOI4fapvZEpgaIMLVS7EsOBL86dKR2OM749ms+tbvk3ZqfdxYWZJBin oNd2RfYk0Iing== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85E7A47C5E; Tue, 14 May 2024 21:33:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Brendan Jackman , Daniel Latypov Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brendan Higgins , davidgow@google.com, rmoar@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Clarify test filter format In-Reply-To: References: <20240402125109.1251232-1-jackmanb@google.com> Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 15:33:52 -0600 Message-ID: <87wmnw5b9b.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Brendan Jackman writes: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 02:59:43PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote: >> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov > > Hi Jonathan, I think this is ready to be applied? I'm happy to take this, but normally these patches go through the kunit tree, so I've not been paying much attention. Let me know please if I should pick it up. Thanks, jon