public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	lance@osuosl.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:13:11 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn1xquq0.fsf@mail.concordia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAABZP2z=xu+07-y5fqFLidZz1VpSgrSwXa1mFHPb=b3Ezr3OtA@mail.gmail.com>

Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:09 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> writes:
>> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 2:01 PM Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:07 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> ...
>> >> >
>> >> > There's 12.2.0 here:
>> >> >   https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/12.2.0/
>> >> >   https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/ppc64le/12.2.0/
>>
>> > powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gcc-12 cross compiler on my Ubuntu 22.04 does
>> > not seem to have that issue as gcc-10 does
>>
>> OK. So so far it's only that GCC 10 that shows the problem.
>>
>> If you have time, you could use some of the other versions to narrow
>> down which versions show the bug:
>>
>>   https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/ppc64le/
>>
>> There's an 11.0, 11.1 and 11.3 there, as well as 9.5 and so on.
> GCC test results (Tested on PPC VM of Open Source Lab of Oregon State
> University)
> gcc 9.4 (ubuntu native):          positive, show bug
> gcc 9.5 (download form [1]):   positive, show bug
> gcc 10.1 (download from [1]): positive, show bug
> gcc 10.3 (download from [1]): positive, show bug
> gcc 10.4 (download from [1]): positive, show bug
>
> gcc 11.0 (download from [1]): negative, no bug
> gcc 11.1 (download from [1]): negative, no bug
> gcc 11.3 (download from [1]): negative, no bug
> gcc 12.1 (download from [1]): negative, no bug
> gcc 12.2 (download from [1]): negative, no bug

Awesome work.

How are you testing for presence/absence of the bug? By running your
test and seeing if it crashes, or by looking at the generated code?

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-27 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-22 12:46 BUG : PowerPC RCU: torture test failed with __stack_chk_fail Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-22 19:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-23  1:37   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-23  5:45     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-22 19:28 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-24  0:32   ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-24  4:00     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-24 13:14     ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-24 15:13       ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-24 15:28         ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-24 17:29           ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-04-24 19:25             ` Boqun Feng
2023-04-24 18:55           ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-25 10:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 10:58               ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25 11:06                 ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-25  3:12                   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25 13:40                   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-04-25 13:49                     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-26  0:32                       ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26  1:31                         ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-26  2:15                           ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26  2:37                             ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-26  0:42                     ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26 12:29                   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-26 13:44                     ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-26 14:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-26 14:45                         ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-28 10:35                     ` Christophe Leroy
2023-04-25 10:59               ` Joel Fernandes
2023-04-25 11:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-04-25 13:36                   ` Christophe Leroy
2023-04-24 22:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-24 22:13   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25  6:01   ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-25  9:27     ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-27  3:09       ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-27  3:32         ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-27  9:21         ` Zhouyi Zhou
2023-04-27 14:13           ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-04-27 14:29             ` Zhouyi Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wn1xquq0.fsf@mail.concordia \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=lance@osuosl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhouzhouyi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox