public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi <michael@amarulasolutions.com>,
	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Michael <michael@mipisi.de>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] time: alarmtimer: Use TASK_FREEZABLE to cleanup freezer handling
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 23:58:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wn3ykbfa.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zg8ukd54.ffs@tglx>

On Thu, Mar 02 2023 at 23:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02 2023 at 15:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:19 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>> +static atomic_t alarmtimer_wakeup;
>>>
>>>  /**
>>>   * alarmtimer_fired - Handles alarm hrtimer being fired.
>>> @@ -194,6 +196,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart alarmtimer_f
>>>         int ret = HRTIMER_NORESTART;
>>>         int restart = ALARMTIMER_NORESTART;
>>>
>>> +       atomic_inc(&alarmtimer_wakeup);
>>> +
>>
>> This appears to be still somewhat racy, because the notifier can run
>> at this point AFAICS.
>
> Indeed it is. Let me think more about this.

All of this is inherently racy as there is zero feedback whether the
event has been consumed or not. Making this feedback based is not
necessarily trivial, but let me stare into that.

Thanks,

        tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-11  6:45 [RFC][PATCH 1/2] time: alarmtimer: Fix erroneous case of using 0 as an "invalid" initialization value John Stultz
2023-02-11  6:45 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] time: alarmtimer: Use TASK_FREEZABLE to cleanup freezer handling John Stultz
2023-02-15  8:22   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-15 13:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-18 14:56   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20  7:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-20  8:23       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20 11:47         ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20 17:48           ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-20 18:11             ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-20 21:18               ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-20 21:32                 ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-21  0:12                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-02-21  7:10                     ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-24 10:02                       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-24 10:32                         ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-24 11:57                           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-28  0:03                 ` John Stultz
2023-02-28  4:06                   ` John Stultz
2023-03-01 22:11                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-02  0:47                       ` John Stultz
2023-03-02  9:34                         ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-03-02 15:00                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-15 20:12                           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-03-02 14:54                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-02 14:56                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-02 14:32                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-02 22:21                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-03-02 22:58                     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-06-27  7:46                       ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2024-07-13 10:47                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-07-15  8:20                           ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-21 11:50   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2024-01-11  8:28   ` Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
2023-02-18 14:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] time: alarmtimer: Fix erroneous case of using 0 as an "invalid" initialization value Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wn3ykbfa.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=michael@mipisi.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox