From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@gmail.com>,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com, maz@kernel.org,
lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MSI irqchip configured as IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE causes spurious IRQs
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:15:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wo9ub5f6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGi-RUJvqJoCXWN2YugRn=WYEk9yzt7m3OPfX_o++PmJWQ3woQ@mail.gmail.com>
Ramon Fried <rfried.dev@gmail.com> writes:
> While debugging the root cause of spurious IRQ's on my PCIe MSI line it appears
> that because of the line:
> info->chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE;
> in pci_msi_create_irq_domain()
>
> The IRQF_ONESHOT is ignored, especially when requesting IRQ through
> pci_request_threaded_irq() where handler is NULL.
Which is perfectly fine.
> The problem is that the MSI masking now only surrounds the HW handler,
> and all additional MSI that occur before the threaded handler is
> complete are considered by the note_interrupt() as spurious.
Which is not a problem as long as the thread finishes before 100k MSIs
arrived on that line. If that happens then there is something really
wrong. Either the device fires MSIs like crazy or the threaded handler
is stuck somewhere.
> Besides the side effect of that, I don't really understand the logic
> of not masking the MSI until the threaded handler is complete,
> especially when there's no HW handler and only threaded handler.
What's wrong with having another interrupt firing while the threaded
handler is running? Nothing, really. It actually can be desired because
the threaded handler is allowed to sleep.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-14 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 10:27 MSI irqchip configured as IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE causes spurious IRQs Ramon Fried
2020-01-02 8:19 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-13 14:59 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-14 12:15 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-01-14 21:38 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-14 21:40 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-14 22:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-16 0:19 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-16 1:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-16 7:58 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-16 9:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-17 13:32 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-17 14:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-17 15:43 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-17 17:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-17 20:01 ` Ramon Fried
2020-01-17 22:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-20 8:02 ` Ramon Fried
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wo9ub5f6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=rfried.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox