From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>,
John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fix full speed mode
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:23:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wpeudc1h.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9391d38-52b6-b8d8-bd30-52ae5247167e@synopsys.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1748 bytes --]
Hi,
John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com> writes:
> On 12/7/2016 7:06 PM, John Youn wrote:
>> On 12/7/2016 4:44 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
>>>>>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
>>>>>>> DCFG.DEVSPD == 0x3 is not valid and we need to set
>>>>>>> DCFG.DEVSPD to 0x1 for full speed mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> seems like it has been made invalid somewhere between 1.73a and
>>>>>> 2.60a. Can you figure it out from Documentation why and when it was made
>>>>>> invalid? We might need revision checks here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try to dig out more.
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't figure out more information on this. The changelogs in the TRMs
>>>> don't capture this change and I don't have access to all TRM versions
>>>> so I can't say which version it got changed and why.
>>>>
>>>> Can we please involve someone from Synopsis to provide this information?
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> John, could you help us with this query? We'd like to understand why one
>>> of the FULLSPEED modes got removed. Do we need a revision check or can
>>> we assume that the other mode was never supposed to be used?
>>>
>>
>> Full speed is 0x1. 0x3 may still work due to how the bits are
>> checked. But it definitely should be 0x1.
>>
>> I'm not sure if it was 0x3 before. I still need to confirm whether
>> that was the case or not and if so why.
>>
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> According to the old databook, 0x3 was for FS in 48MHz mode for 1.1
> transceiver, which was never supported. UTMI FS was still specified as
> 0x1 in those old databooks.
Thank you, so Roger we should actually completely remove FULLSPEED
setting of 0x3. Can you update the patch accordingly?
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-20 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-29 10:56 [PATCH 0/2] usb: dwc3: fix full speed gadget mode configuration Roger Quadros
2016-11-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Fix full speed mode Roger Quadros
2016-11-29 11:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-11-29 12:28 ` Roger Quadros
2016-12-07 12:16 ` Roger Quadros
2016-12-07 12:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-12-08 3:06 ` John Youn
2016-12-17 1:02 ` John Youn
2016-12-20 12:23 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-11-29 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: gadget: Clean up DCFG/DSTS FULLSPEED macro Roger Quadros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wpeudc1h.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=John.Youn@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox