From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] modpost: don't emit section mismatch warnings for compiler optimizations
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:32:12 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wq17pnff.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429471248-4641-2-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> writes:
> Currently an allyesconfig build [gcc-4.9.1] can generate the following:
>
> WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3864): Section mismatch in
> reference from the function cpumask_empty.constprop.3() to the
> variable .init.data:nmi_ipi_mask
>
> which comes from the cpumask_empty usage in arch/x86/kernel/nmi_selftest.c.
Thanks for the excellent explanation and patches.
Applied!
Rusty.
>
> Normally we would not see a symbol entry for cpumask_empty since it is:
>
> static inline bool cpumask_empty(const struct cpumask *srcp)
>
> however in this case, the variant of the symbol gets emitted when GCC does
> constant propagation optimization.
>
> Fix things up so that any locally optimized constprop variants don't warn
> when accessing variables that live in the __init sections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> ---
> scripts/mod/modpost.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> index b18cecb6bf5a..572f1e4a2626 100644
> --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> @@ -908,6 +908,9 @@ static const char *const init_sections[] = { ALL_INIT_SECTIONS, NULL };
> static const char *const init_exit_sections[] =
> {ALL_INIT_SECTIONS, ALL_EXIT_SECTIONS, NULL };
>
> +/* all text sections */
> +static const char *const text_sections[] = { ALL_TEXT_SECTIONS, NULL };
> +
> /* data section */
> static const char *const data_sections[] = { DATA_SECTIONS, NULL };
>
> @@ -926,6 +929,7 @@ static const char *const data_sections[] = { DATA_SECTIONS, NULL };
> static const char *const head_sections[] = { ".head.text*", NULL };
> static const char *const linker_symbols[] =
> { "__init_begin", "_sinittext", "_einittext", NULL };
> +static const char *const optim_symbols[] = { "*.constprop.*", NULL };
>
> enum mismatch {
> TEXT_TO_ANY_INIT,
> @@ -1127,6 +1131,17 @@ static const struct sectioncheck *section_mismatch(
> * This pattern is identified by
> * refsymname = __init_begin, _sinittext, _einittext
> *
> + * Pattern 5:
> + * GCC may optimize static inlines when fed constant arg(s) resulting
> + * in functions like cpumask_empty() -- generating an associated symbol
> + * cpumask_empty.constprop.3 that appears in the audit. If the const that
> + * is passed in comes from __init, like say nmi_ipi_mask, we get a
> + * meaningless section warning. May need to add isra symbols too...
> + * This pattern is identified by
> + * tosec = init section
> + * fromsec = text section
> + * refsymname = *.constprop.*
> + *
> **/
> static int secref_whitelist(const struct sectioncheck *mismatch,
> const char *fromsec, const char *fromsym,
> @@ -1159,6 +1174,12 @@ static int secref_whitelist(const struct sectioncheck *mismatch,
> if (match(tosym, linker_symbols))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Check for pattern 5 */
> + if (match(fromsec, text_sections) &&
> + match(tosec, init_sections) &&
> + match(fromsym, optim_symbols))
> + return 0;
> +
> return 1;
> }
>
> --
> 2.2.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-20 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-19 19:20 [PATCH 1/2] modpost: expand pattern matching to support substring matches Paul Gortmaker
2015-04-19 19:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] modpost: don't emit section mismatch warnings for compiler optimizations Paul Gortmaker
2015-04-20 2:02 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wq17pnff.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox