From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752454AbaGaVE0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:04:26 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:28989 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750906AbaGaVEZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:04:25 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,862,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="366430265" From: Andi Kleen To: peterz@infradead.org Cc: eranian@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf, x86: Handle extended offcore mask on Haswell References: <1406839689-23491-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 14:04:25 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1406839689-23491-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (Andi Kleen's message of "Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:48:09 -0700") Message-ID: <87wqatp7dy.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen writes: > From: Andi Kleen > > HSW-EP has a larger offcore mask than the client Haswell CPUs. > It is the same mask as on Sandy/IvyBridge-EP. Sorry I posted the wrong patch, not matching the description. Use the followon patch instead. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only