From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756207Ab3EaRsL (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2013 13:48:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175]:48387 "EHLO mail-pd0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754155Ab3EaRsH (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2013 13:48:07 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Hebbar Gururaja Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: omap: add option to indicate wakeup support through DT References: <1369982005-8572-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <1369982005-8572-2-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:48:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1369982005-8572-2-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> (Hebbar Gururaja's message of "Fri, 31 May 2013 12:03:24 +0530") Message-ID: <87wqqf11nw.fsf@linaro.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hebbar Gururaja writes: > Even though RTC-IP is wakeup capable, Not all Boards support it. > > For example > The rtc alarm wakeup is available in rtc-ip since omap1 days but alarm > was not wired properly in previous ompa1 boards. > > commit fa5b07820fe3a0fc06ac368516e71f10a59b9539 > Author: Sekhar Nori > Date: Wed Oct 27 15:33:05 2010 -0700 > > rtc: omap: let device wakeup capability be configured from chip > init logic > > The rtc-omap driver currently hardcodes the RTC wakeup > capability to be "not capable". While this seems to be true for > existing OMAP1 boards which are not wired for this, the > DA850/OMAP-L138 SoC, the RTC can always be wake up source from > its "deep sleep" mode. > > Current rtc-omap driver expects the rtc module wake-up capabilities to > be set up by board specific code. However, in case of DT, this is not > possible. > > So, add a DT property "ti,wakeup_capable" to indicate that the module is > wake-up capable. Why is this a TI-specific property? Also, I think we can do this without a new DT property.Did you see this patch from Tony which is already queued for v3.11: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=136917244530612&w=2 I think this is the right way to go. Platforms that don't want/need wakeup support can disable it from userspace via: echo disabled > /sys/devices/.../power/wakeup Kevin