* Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0 - "uid" parameter no longer valid?
@ 2012-05-24 3:08 D. Stussy
2012-05-24 14:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: D. Stussy @ 2012-05-24 3:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
proc: unrecognized mount option "uid=1" or missing value
This works under 3.3.6 and earlier (I never tried 3.3.7). It appears that the
"uid" mount option was removed. WHY? More importantly, where is this change
listed? I didn't see it in the git log.
This is really bad as I rebooted a remotely colocated server and since the
procfs is not mounted, I cannot log in via SSH to correct the problem.
OK, so there's not that much point in changing the UID of the procfs files,
but I preferred to set their default ownership to a non-privileged user.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0 - "uid" parameter no longer valid?
2012-05-24 3:08 Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0 - "uid" parameter no longer valid? D. Stussy
@ 2012-05-24 14:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2012-05-24 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: D. Stussy; +Cc: linux-kernel
"D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> writes:
> proc: unrecognized mount option "uid=1" or missing value
>
> This works under 3.3.6 and earlier (I never tried 3.3.7). It appears that the
> "uid" mount option was removed. WHY? More importantly, where is this change
> listed? I didn't see it in the git log.
>
> This is really bad as I rebooted a remotely colocated server and since the
> procfs is not mounted, I cannot log in via SSH to correct the problem.
>
> OK, so there's not that much point in changing the UID of the procfs files, but
> I preferred to set their default ownership to a non-privileged user.
There has never been a uid= option to /proc in Linus's tree. I believe
if you look you will find this feature was from a patch (perhaps from
your distro) that added that support.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0 - "uid" parameter no longer valid?
@ 2012-05-24 19:52 kd6lvw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: kd6lvw @ 2012-05-24 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: linux-kernel
--- On Thu, 5/24/12, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
> "D. Stussy" <spam+newsgroups@bde-arc.ampr.org> writes:
> > proc: unrecognized mount option "uid=1" or missing value
> >
> > This works under 3.3.6 and earlier (I never tried 3.3.7). It appears that the
> > "uid" mount option was removed. WHY? More importantly, where is this change
> > listed? I didn't see it in the git log.
> >
> > This is really bad as I rebooted a remotely colocated server and since the
> > procfs is not mounted, I cannot log in via SSH to correct the problem.
> >
> > OK, so there's not that much point in changing the UID of the procfs files, but
> > I preferred to set their default ownership to a non-privileged user.
>
> There has never been a uid= option to /proc in Linus's tree. I believe
> if you look you will find this feature was from a patch (perhaps from
> your distro) that added that support.
I compile both the util-linux-ng and the kernel from source. There is no distribution patch involved. As noted, kernel version 3.3.6 didn't bitch about the setting, while 3.4.0 does and won't mount procfs.
>From the man page (copy at "http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount"):
"Mount options for proc
"uid=value and gid=value
"These options are recognized, but have no effect as far as I can see."
Removal of this compatibility should have been noted. WHERE was it noted? Linux.die.net is a distribution independent documentation site. It might not do anything, but per mount's documentation, it is acceptable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-24 19:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-24 3:08 Mounting /proc w/ kernel 3.4.0 - "uid" parameter no longer valid? D. Stussy
2012-05-24 14:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-05-24 19:52 kd6lvw
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox