public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ccross@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] cpu_pm: call notifiers during suspend
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:01:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wrdjku9h.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E684F90.7010809@ti.com> (Santosh's message of "Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:46:00 +0530")

Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> writes:

> On Thursday 08 September 2011 01:32 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>  writes:
>>
>>> From: Colin Cross<ccross@android.com>
>>>
>>> Implements syscore_ops in cpu_pm to call the cpu and
>>> cpu cluster notifiers during suspend and resume,
>>> allowing drivers receiving the notifications to
>>> avoid implementing syscore_ops.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross<ccross@android.com>
>>> [santosh.shilimkar@ti.com: Rebased against 3.1-rc4]
>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>
>> I don't think using syscore_ops is right here.  The platform code should
>> decide where in its own suspend path the notifiers should be triggered.
>>
>> The reason is because while the syscore_ops run late in the suspend
>> path, they still run before some platform-specific decisions about the
>> low-power states are made.  That means that any notifiers that need to
>> use information about the target low-power state (e.g. whether context
>> will be lost or not) cannot do so since that information has not yet
>> been decided until the platform_suspend_ops->enter() runs.
>>
> Initially I thought the same but in general S2R, platform doesn't
> support multiple states like CPUIDLE. On OMAP, we do have a debug
> option to choose the state but on real product, it's always the
> deepest supported state is used. So the driver saving the
> full context for S2R, should be fine.
>
> Ofcourse for CPUIDLE, the notifier call chain decisions are left
> with platform CPUIDLE drivers since there can be multiple low
> power states and the context save/restore has to be done based
> on low power states.
>
> The advantage with this is, the platform code is clean from the
> notfiers calls. CPUIDLE driver needs to call the different notifier
> events based on C-states and that perfectly works.
>
> I liked this simplification for the S2R. Down side is in S2R if you
> don't plan to hit deepest state, drivers end up saving full context
> which is fine I guess.

That's not the downside I'm worried about.

If you have a driver that has a notifier, presumably it has something it
wants to do to prepare for suspend *and* for idle, and you'd only want a
single notifier callback in the driver to be used for both.  That
callback would look something like:

   start_preparing_for_suspend();

   if (next_state == OFF)
      save_context();

   finish_preparing_for_suspend();


The problem with the current cpu_*_pm_enter() calls in syscore_ops is
that they happen before the next states are programmed, so during
suspend the 'if (next_state == off)' above would never be true, but
during idle it might be.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-03 14:39 [PATCH v2 0/5] CPU PM notifiers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cpu_pm: Add cpu power management notifiers Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-09 22:56   ` Andrew Morton
2011-09-10  4:02     ` Santosh
2011-09-10  9:31     ` Santosh
2011-09-12  5:02       ` Santosh
2011-09-13  5:42         ` Santosh
2011-09-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cpu_pm: call notifiers during suspend Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-07 20:02   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-08  5:16     ` Santosh
2011-09-08 14:01       ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-08 16:12         ` Santosh
2011-09-08 18:04         ` Colin Cross
     [not found]           ` <87ehzqbvvh.fsf@ti.com>
2011-09-09  6:27             ` Santosh
2011-09-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: gic: Use cpu pm notifiers to save gic state Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: vfp: Use cpu pm notifiers to save vfp state Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-03 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: gic: Allow gic arch extensions to provide irqchip flags Santosh Shilimkar
2011-09-06  2:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] CPU PM notifiers Shawn Guo
2011-09-06  5:17   ` Santosh
2011-09-09 18:00 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-10  5:53   ` Santosh
2011-09-16  4:50 ` Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wrdjku9h.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox