Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] rv/rtapp: Add wakeup monitor

[Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>]

Chao Liu <chao.liu@processmission.com> writes:
>> +static void handle_sched_waking(void *data, struct task_struct *task)
>> +{
>> +	if (in_task()) {
>> +		if (current->prio > task->prio)
>> +			ltl_atom_pulse(task, LTL_WOKEN_BY_LOWER_PRIO, true);
>
> The implementation also reports wakeups from softirq context through
> WOKEN_BY_SOFTIRQ:
>
>> +	} else if (in_serving_softirq()) {
>> +		ltl_atom_pulse(task, LTL_WOKEN_BY_SOFTIRQ, true);
>> +	}
>
> Should this description mention softirq wakeups as well?

Technically, on RT kernel, softirq is a SCHED_OTHER task. On !RT kernel,
softirq can also be executed as a SCHED_OTHER task, which is the cause
for concern.

But explicitly mentioning softirq does not hurt, I wouldn't oppose that.

Nam