public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kunit: fat: test cluster and directory i_pos layout helpers
Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2026 14:18:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0j2m1d0.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260405011920.28622-1-adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>

Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com> writes:

> Add KUnit coverage for fat_clus_to_blknr() and fat_get_blknr_offset()
> using stub msdos_sb_info values so cluster-to-sector and i_pos split
> math stays correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adi Nata <adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com>

Looks good.

Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

Thanks.

> ---
>  fs/fat/fat_test.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/fat_test.c b/fs/fat/fat_test.c
> index 1f0062659067..add44178f28e 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/fat_test.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/fat_test.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,37 @@ static void fat_checksum_test(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fat_checksum("ABCDEFGHA  "), (u8)98);
>  }
>  
> +static void fat_clus_to_blknr_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct msdos_sb_info sbi = {
> +		.sec_per_clus = 4,
> +		.data_start = 100,
> +	};
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)100,
> +			fat_clus_to_blknr(&sbi, FAT_START_ENT));
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)112, fat_clus_to_blknr(&sbi, 5));
> +}
> +
> +static void fat_get_blknr_offset_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct msdos_sb_info sbi = {
> +		.dir_per_block = 16,
> +		.dir_per_block_bits = 4,
> +	};
> +
> +	sector_t blknr;
> +	int offset;
> +
> +	fat_get_blknr_offset(&sbi, 0, &blknr, &offset);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)0, blknr);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, offset);
> +
> +	fat_get_blknr_offset(&sbi, (10 << 4) | 7, &blknr, &offset);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (sector_t)10, blknr);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 7, offset);
> +}
> +
>  struct fat_timestamp_testcase {
>  	const char *name;
>  	struct timespec64 ts;
> @@ -181,6 +212,8 @@ static void fat_time_unix2fat_test(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  static struct kunit_case fat_test_cases[] = {
>  	KUNIT_CASE(fat_checksum_test),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(fat_clus_to_blknr_test),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(fat_get_blknr_offset_test),
>  	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(fat_time_fat2unix_test, fat_time_gen_params),
>  	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(fat_time_unix2fat_test, fat_time_gen_params),
>  	{},

-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-04-05  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-05  1:19 [PATCH] kunit: fat: test cluster and directory i_pos layout helpers Adi Nata
2026-04-05  5:18 ` OGAWA Hirofumi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y0j2m1d0.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --to=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=adinata.softwareengineer@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox