From: "Miquel Sabaté Solà" <mssola@mssola.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Use a cleanup attribute in copy_fdtable()
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2025 19:41:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0pp455w.fsf@> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251005090152.GE2441659@ZenIV> (Al Viro's message of "Sun, 5 Oct 2025 10:01:52 +0100")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1289 bytes --]
Al Viro @ 2025-10-05 10:01 +01:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2025 at 07:37:50AM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> Al Viro @ 2025-10-04 22:19 +01:
>>
>> > On Sat, Oct 04, 2025 at 11:03:40PM +0200, Miquel Sabaté Solà wrote:
>> >> This is a small cleanup in which by using the __free(kfree) cleanup
>> >> attribute we can avoid three labels to go to, and the code turns to be
>> >> more concise and easier to follow.
>> >
>> > Have you tried to build and boot that?
>>
>> Yes, and it worked on my machine...
>
> Unfortunately, it ends up calling that kfree() on success as well as on failure.
> Idiomatic way to avoid that would be
> return no_free_ptr(fdt);
> but you've left bare
> return fdt;
> in there, ending up with returning dangling pointers to the caller. So as
> soon as you get more than BITS_PER_LONG descriptors used by a process,
> you'll get trouble. In particular, bash(1) running as an interactive shell
> would hit that - it has descriptor 255 opened...
Ugh, this is just silly from my end...
You are absolutely right. I don't know what the hell I was doing while
testing that prevented me from realizing this before, but as you say
it's quite obvious and I was just blind or something.
Sorry for the noise and thanks for your patience...
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 897 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-05 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-04 21:03 [PATCH] fs: Use a cleanup attribute in copy_fdtable() Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-10-04 21:19 ` Al Viro
2025-10-05 5:37 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
2025-10-05 9:01 ` Al Viro
2025-10-05 17:41 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà [this message]
2025-10-05 21:30 ` Al Viro
2025-10-06 7:55 ` Miquel Sabaté Solà
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0pp455w.fsf@ \
--to=mssola@mssola.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox