From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED23C8CE for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 08:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754382699; cv=none; b=qAb1c5yrhkrNAtuhJcnq/5VF1RkKc7Y2fTlV9q3+GPReVElqqCBnMcj6tUtISSgWxQwK46r7qgpSW0eGCnH2u0PCGg3URwBD36uBQ2+1mru3Uxw3D30Oc93eWYnr/2UcfRweuN18kjIjXDf9c3dYr9S5LiVhEF4UdqJlMxSn6/4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754382699; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iTtqvNyWbJ9IkMyX4xULbw3Uvip/5Jol5LjztPeHMjM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PZeLH/mQTnxYvNJn3/oTaavTazbqr7VJn1xxZjP+9gDymt2FL0n7mZt04ULcRA9y30kiyMc0XBiOSBxKchowYXRjyiVKuAviJcljxMMX4WQS4JvX4jeTjbFPWEimnW3WoRIZvOtLWFxfnCUl8Ss5ONon0j4kxYrd8FkCdUrgJ74= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=LPCVLBLR; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=7vbjx/OD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="LPCVLBLR"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="7vbjx/OD" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1754382694; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iTtqvNyWbJ9IkMyX4xULbw3Uvip/5Jol5LjztPeHMjM=; b=LPCVLBLRclUBvupbBbj1ydmGE+YnS7ZiprkW2S+3jmCFxRTi9l5wmf5xCGsfNukGB/kOtk VRLP02xDDn5NQp+OzgeEPgdZebeZQuB5+JAlv6JgxoDt95n3YTX1rXSiVB3VZGVFGi7xjW c2BKn6V224zxyop/X2DJisJffiqDvycQhcU9xXx8OG928Q6ffubi+IaukO/vjQaz6KuRy5 QK6KPQ9sohhBRjdZhYWs9jAaKUPPD963QeVz+jFDiUX1zGLdC6bf8hIhY8hwnJWq2x7MER AkU4NZe8OkrswGWcPmMO+9qby6nG00E3HtHZkRs6jrIWrjf71+PmW2G080fuSA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1754382694; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iTtqvNyWbJ9IkMyX4xULbw3Uvip/5Jol5LjztPeHMjM=; b=7vbjx/ODHtPVdqQPn+aZ5es1lKK0A/i2hqELrRoPrVzo1T7KNht3mPgcbL0G9M4BD3Voyp x+2TkIvX2yHIKWCA== To: Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/msi-lib: Fix fwnode refcount in msi_lib_irq_domain_select() In-Reply-To: <20250804145553.795065-1-lpieralisi@kernel.org> References: <20250804145553.795065-1-lpieralisi@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 10:31:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87y0ryf9uj.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Aug 04 2025 at 16:55, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > msi_lib_irq_domain_select() is used in other arches, I could not > test on those (don't know if they have non-[DT/irqchip/acpi] specific > fwnodes) - from a fwnode interface perspective I think that this patch > does the right thing, it should not add any issue to existing code > to the best of my knowledge but it has to be verified. fwnode handles are architecture and firmware agnostic.