From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Liya Huang <1425075683@qq.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Liya Huang <1425075683@qq.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix-timers: omit posix_cpu_timers_init_group when CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:53:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0tvpoq7.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_92F5880EDEB07D078301A561B64F06F9AC0A@qq.com>
On Sat, Jun 07 2025 at 19:41, Liya Huang wrote:
> When POSIX timers are disabled (CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS=n), the helper
> function posix_cpu_timers_init_group() is effectively a no-op—but it
> still consumes valuable code space. To avoid generating an empty stub,
> we should conditionally compile this function out entirely when POSIX
> timers support is turned off.
I have no idea what you are trying to say here. See below.
> This logic was originally introduced in commit b18b6a9cef7f ("timers:
> Omit POSIX timer stuff from task_struct when disabled"), but was
> dropped in commit 244d49e30653 ("posix-cpu-timers: Move state tracking
> to struct posix_cputimers")
Can you please format your change logs properly as everybody else
does? These indents provide zero value.
> ---
> Signed-off-by: Liya Huang <1425075683@qq.com>
> ---
> kernel/fork.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
> index 168681fc4b25a9fddcb90ce155c027551455f4ee..9632e863c17b44424fadc40b2445034ec5cd20d6 100644
> --- a/kernel/fork.c
> +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> @@ -1883,6 +1883,7 @@ void __cleanup_sighand(struct sighand_struct *sighand)
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
> /*
> * Initialize POSIX timer handling for a thread group.
> */
> @@ -1894,6 +1895,9 @@ static void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig)
> cpu_limit = READ_ONCE(sig->rlim[RLIMIT_CPU].rlim_cur);
> posix_cputimers_group_init(pct, cpu_limit);
> }
> +#else
> +static inline void posix_cpu_timers_init_group(struct signal_struct *sig) { }
> +#endif
If CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS=n then posix_cputimers_group_init() is an empty
inline function and the compiler optimizes posix_cpu_timers_init_group()
away completely. If it does not, then the compiler wants to be fixed.
And no, we are not adding ugly ifdeffery just because.
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-13 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-07 11:41 [PATCH] posix-timers: omit posix_cpu_timers_init_group when CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS is disabled Liya Huang
2025-06-12 13:22 ` 1425075683
2025-06-13 16:53 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0tvpoq7.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=1425075683@qq.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox