From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24743F9D2; Mon, 19 May 2025 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747666776; cv=none; b=dnKOldbScWxygX/5S2Y541Nh4R7bkmsD0/huzUn0FkKKGq8EsovWHel1IDZlOTNMzm7ErtXJY9zbYiY2iv96J9Pf6MJYnLJuqbqxOQ0B/qgx+FF3chr1fVcKVN9VwnXwycQYRbKgR/nzaerWHytAlh3atSOK+8QIXnljIhY6FKk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747666776; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LlINlnvjkPrNwRHqI0nwGTekbcuufu1HgbzTRAhzUbY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ippFdmtY4/haL3ykLV8lX2yLI5F446ZFwKj28Ljb2lWATABIvFXRCUkw1TFXrA6WZMsD74s+lImVwBanIddaE0VKqTCXqYZpKu2zNEo/IeD/O+CPVF+UCZhac9a2UgAiWnWN7Oxql7htS+xNKcDCzxUGKlbvRDIEiBXAmQ04XqE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=BC5MN+Tv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="BC5MN+Tv" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net EA1FD41086 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1747666774; bh=+rX5+eunrT2/Z/JqYzLSRdS/nAoA5hDjcDv7ReJ+phc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=BC5MN+TvAPKphNSf29MF+MCPM2Fuqns7MMGVFRi1YCn08eO2Oucwn6AXYqto2hvXr ANqicqrNEGDnTZDLuPtQX9GxnUk0+ZiUUJGO6/0gdumyFS93rQgxje5HnpwHSVzsNj Of5jxXj+yDRn0iQWoCJFRr28dSvxqhAFFS1B7ZR3+upWTHZ8tjd7TPKYcvPg9IwMHe 56abe+fJ0aF+3zDvIEhPfs3BBiQIucBjCa008Gn9hOwmrZAkAWTnoSJoW89WWirtZf wylnTRwEPsxkcM83spIDoWIdH4oFN76c6infWRxgRnJWuDMajJA0CxTQfBvvouGsp4 q+MEVQKzxsf3A== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA1FD41086; Mon, 19 May 2025 14:59:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Bagas Sanjaya , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Documentation Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Donnellan , Frederic Barrat , Bagas Sanjaya , Ming Lei , Lukas Bulwahn , Alyssa Ross , Beau Belgrave , Nuno Das Neves , Eric Biggers , Michael Ellerman , Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: ioctl-number: Update table intro In-Reply-To: <20250508005838.8381-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> References: <20250508005838.8381-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 08:59:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87y0usir3i.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Bagas Sanjaya writes: > Introduction paragraph to the ioctl numbers table states that only > ioctls in up to ancient Linux kernel version (v2.6.31) for x86 arch are > listed. This is inaccurate as the table also lists ioctls from non-x86 > archs and the kernel is continously developed (currently in v6.x). > > Update the paragraph accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya > --- > Changes since v1 [1]: > - Do not mention kernel version (Lukas) > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/20250507055145.23345-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com/ > > Documentation/userspace-api/ioctl/ioctl-number.rst | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks. jon