From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@riseup.net>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dwmw@amazon.co.uk, mhkelley@outlook.com, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/i8253: fix possible deadlock when turning off the PIT
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 23:52:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0wqw0gg.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878qoqxjew.ffs@tglx>
On Thu, Mar 27 2025 at 22:17, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Though I really want people to sit down and think about the factual
> impact of a tool based problem observation. Tools are good in detecting
> problems, but they are patently bad in properly analysing them. And no,
> AI is not going to fix that anytime soon, quite the contrary.
May I recommend you to ask your favorite AI model of the moment the
following question:
"Explain the discussion in the email thread starting at:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250327152258.3097-1-ffmancera@riseup.net"
I'm sure that I'm patently bad at AI prompt engineering, but that does
not justify the utter insanities which these models threw back at me.
ChapGPT:
"....
This patch adds a selftest (automated test) for the nftables
flowtable feature using a netdevice. It targets the netfilter
subsystem, which is responsible for packet filtering, NAT, and other
packet mangling in the Linux kernel."
Grok:
See
https://tglx.de/~tglx/grok.html
for the full glory of AI hallucinations.
At least those two were halfways reasonable:
Gemini:
"API REQUEST ERROR Reason: Unknown."
Claude:
"I don't have access to the specific URL you've provided ...
my knowledge cutoff was in October 2024 ..."
Seriously?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-27 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 15:22 [PATCH v2] x86/i8253: fix possible deadlock when turning off the PIT Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-03-27 16:43 ` David Woodhouse
2025-03-27 17:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-27 19:54 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-03-27 21:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-03-27 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-27 21:36 ` Fernando F. Mancera
2025-03-27 22:52 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-03-27 23:15 ` Fernando F. Mancera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0wqw0gg.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=ffmancera@riseup.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhkelley@outlook.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox