From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0167715F417 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 06:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716964440; cv=none; b=VPUNk+88RaqO+G4TqKheiMAxh7tgGFvC3WZe+++pUuuTfXCtC0SmW47sD93rLJ/zUXcGdUhgT79ek+/dHyLF1YZxe3DpaobjmlsRdmG3PmKFFcexZjYIHSAWFCiQJN7K6UwXg5/PS6D2axRZ2JVIYZsL1xiTQAjIN/bumpdnFFY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716964440; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zbqHMBELg8onnZxF8qJjAEKesjCHoQAEOACipj7FrHo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nhFyFouNSe2+PTLeF6mr03pKwq2NFDTEbBHf7wJs++VYbKhz1Qy7n1vxuwGZCktEfmf39XxHCX2TSIk8txFGS8uHHS+Z39Kfh6zDaPcnE/z0KCjEJ/WApyB9Mtzs0s6GqnEFZyGA+foyChONp4NiZtIzZhxxQAYSaW2EA+IOaeU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=dKBKp2TZ; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=81g5Bwjx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="dKBKp2TZ"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="81g5Bwjx" From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1716964436; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zbqHMBELg8onnZxF8qJjAEKesjCHoQAEOACipj7FrHo=; b=dKBKp2TZ3dWpAvpfzNXr5n3Bv22278GmncociLF5efWtmt8Rm3jdyHN9gSPwRKX5vcqlEX Z55JUICXtgCkk+8/Jyl+VfeDDy7u3KS+oF93oGvvZN1xOBq2TSnWZLBJBTP3suCbOBWHIf PezHsMsrQPa1/qMPB7Jh2bUcVUCj79EbaNXoSNjj00AilWc7i45wK9fKlVN0+kABXlHbzv kxsRHGGbWd+NBn1jClqlK15gAhtnIcu9T/Z2sEzoPvXaR33zvR0qWwEj/5WmNJ0gFwqv8+ YnNabwXdImDBcxtMCzUHGJXg267KlKor4ZQgHoZV6yk/hqRJMC3h8IOKrRZfHw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1716964436; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=zbqHMBELg8onnZxF8qJjAEKesjCHoQAEOACipj7FrHo=; b=81g5BwjxUJ0rOx1MAshsGFpXgAgIulzoJPmZxQI6qnQRgHcCoNAPmdhxituOO1L1GMyDhd iBG/bIjhc2Wo96DA== To: Petr Mladek , Xiang Gao Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fengqi@xiaomi.com, xiaoa Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Increase PRINTK_PREFIX_MAX and the buf size in print_caller. In-Reply-To: References: <20240527091929.316471-1-gxxa03070307@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:39:25 +0206 Message-ID: <87y17tktze.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-05-27, Petr Mladek wrote: > If you need to modify the code to add the extra info, you could also > modify the buffer size. Exactly this. Your out-of-tree patch to add extra info should also make the necessary changes to the buffer sizes. It is your out-of-tree patch that is broken, not mainline Linux. John Ogness