From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15740366 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711412089; cv=none; b=YIycLXKqC2TYevwiaGoXm3BZMckKZISuP43WGzvWFL+si+3zIPX7ENzPz8JSCDvHlBy2pNmBoBfEaZWmuC9FCy3maygLui7fSxh0YoYbFJm0whug0IvpWOM3tGcueP6sMySnXBSzTMhQ3q8oVY8G9z0CfVApKNcwRcdojQkxxSs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711412089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E4KTnXt2Y7NcapFOcTmzVfW2aMNP+O+RjwJpSGQNtl0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VvrBLqpLJ6BpK+TU50Fq2dj/AFHEUaqS3jAfKyZ9MhPf2WKeUEPeMgWvRIQMHGP0p9e4Y8qVSIwUy15/Ce4FCIxbm17LZvNmfZKzduWWEzGOycJc2BXttPwQzblQM+MLYxitRvcczlTBaqWUDEZTrbzXbrot0ZbtT0X3/CQt95M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=rCjMMln7; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=fjvGN5Hm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="rCjMMln7"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="fjvGN5Hm" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1711412085; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eZJgdlzdI+hCvUn2/5zVki0rpf+2SpFCgxZhk5PiSEY=; b=rCjMMln7w9Pe4GsPJaKuJv4FkWDk2zbCq5WMvEJwa+L+OF0XFrgbu0UgIXQtZbxh/LoO44 vBxlrX46RC/zw1P+pBhGzQEy6l6VB9bGZZSnhmTS0CjM/9poEQPUypqIiMNTMvtpGPmpXo AJl44fcf09OtdlDfGbDzFgA021XN8KYlCXY3+b1fha92ojzht7B5y5zcDtJJKF36ZRQ8nt X/CfvCQjKdX7semp8YnQ0kDaIGMJAyBvMnpja/WyEWNs+ZwDTuZUjgw6Rd5d71AOFEapUa sAcUJ0Sf0xqEV5osSGRF8L1Rcrzu50eSAG5mewd2oqDWUx4pGU8PmWKrFZk5Dw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1711412085; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eZJgdlzdI+hCvUn2/5zVki0rpf+2SpFCgxZhk5PiSEY=; b=fjvGN5Hm9cFXxR3eQxk74HFh5aVXQHWgT30TcnRHl3kzndlrkviHgfwfNACRNyGyqOvzKu vE9Nd57WvVWxgfBg== To: Saurabh Singh Sengar Cc: dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ssengar@microsoft.com, sgeorgejohn@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: Map NUMA node to CPUs as per DeviceTree In-Reply-To: <20240325162421.GA2326@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <1710265404-23146-1-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com> <87v85bfzg0.ffs@tglx> <20240324162833.GA18417@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> <87jzlqfk4n.ffs@tglx> <20240325162421.GA2326@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 01:14:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87y1a5etmy.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Mar 25 2024 at 09:24, Saurabh Singh Sengar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:42:32PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Thanks for suggestion, this will fix for all the x86 dtb platforms at once. > I wonder if there will be any user of x86_dtb_parse_smp_config outside > of this file after this change. Possibly we can make it static ? > > I can send the v2, however if you prefer pushing all these changes yourself > please let me know. It's a suggestion. Feel free to make it work and write the change logs for it :) Thanks, tglx