From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>,
Ankit K Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Pablo Ceballos" <pceballos@google.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 12:02:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1ib9x6l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230816045654.833973-1-pceballos@google.com>
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023, Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com> wrote:
> This is to eliminate all cases of "*ERROR* LSPCON mode hasn't settled",
> followed by link training errors. Intel engineers recommended increasing
> this timeout and that does resolve the issue.
>
> On some CometLake-based device designs the Parade PS175 takes more than
> 400ms to settle in PCON mode. 100 reboot trials on one device resulted
> in a median settle time of 440ms and a maximum of 444ms. Even after
> increasing the timeout to 500ms, 2% of devices still had this error. So
> this increases the timeout to 800ms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Ceballos <pceballos@google.com>
I think we've been here before. Do you have a publicly available gitlab
issue with the proper logs? If not, please file one at [1].
BR,
Jani.
[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/new
> ---
>
> V2: Added more details in the commit message
> V3: Only apply the increased timeout if the vendor is Parade
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> index bb3b5355a0d9..b07eab84cc63 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_lspcon.c
> @@ -153,6 +153,24 @@ static enum drm_lspcon_mode lspcon_get_current_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon)
> return current_mode;
> }
>
> +static u32 lspcon_get_mode_settle_timeout(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon)
> +{
> + u32 timeout_ms = 400;
> +
> + /*
> + * On some CometLake-based device designs the Parade PS175 takes more
> + * than 400ms to settle in PCON mode. 100 reboot trials on one device
> + * resulted in a median settle time of 440ms and a maximum of 444ms.
> + * Even after increasing the timeout to 500ms, 2% of devices still had
> + * this error. So this sets the timeout to 800ms.
> + */
> + if (lspcon->vendor == LSPCON_VENDOR_PARADE)
> + timeout_ms = 800;
> +
> + return timeout_ms;
> +}
> +
> +
> static enum drm_lspcon_mode lspcon_wait_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon,
> enum drm_lspcon_mode mode)
> {
> @@ -167,7 +185,8 @@ static enum drm_lspcon_mode lspcon_wait_mode(struct intel_lspcon *lspcon,
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "Waiting for LSPCON mode %s to settle\n",
> lspcon_mode_name(mode));
>
> - wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode, 400);
> + wait_for((current_mode = lspcon_get_current_mode(lspcon)) == mode,
> + lspcon_get_mode_settle_timeout(lspcon));
> if (current_mode != mode)
> drm_err(&i915->drm, "LSPCON mode hasn't settled\n");
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-16 4:56 [PATCH v3] drm/i915/display/lspcon: Increase LSPCON mode settle timeout Pablo Ceballos
2023-08-16 9:02 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-10-02 10:00 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y1ib9x6l.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pceballos@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox