From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AC0C43381 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9284E21A80 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405977AbfBOK4Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:56:25 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52312 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726160AbfBOK4Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2019 05:56:25 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=vostro.local) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gubAH-0000xP-7K; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:56:17 +0100 From: John Ogness To: Petr Mladek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Sergey Senozhatsky , Steven Rostedt , Daniel Wang , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Cox , Jiri Slaby , Peter Feiner , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 02/25] printk-rb: add prb locking functions References: <20190212143003.48446-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de> <20190212143003.48446-3-john.ogness@linutronix.de> <20190213154541.wvft64nf352vghou@pathway.suse.cz> <87pnrvs707.fsf@linutronix.de> <20190214103324.viexpifsyons5qya@pathway.suse.cz> <87y36ih8p7.fsf@linutronix.de> <20190215102635.kdo4yxifh5dt2yj7@pathway.suse.cz> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:56:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190215102635.kdo4yxifh5dt2yj7@pathway.suse.cz> (Petr Mladek's message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:26:35 +0100") Message-ID: <87y36hials.fsf@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-02-15, Petr Mladek wrote: >>> void prb_lock(struct prb_cpulock *cpu_lock) >>> { >>> unsigned int flags; >>> int cpu; >> >> I added an explicit preempt_disable here: >> >> cpu = get_cpu(); > > It is superfluous. Preemption is not possible when interrupts > are disabled. Interrupts are not necessarily disabled here. They get disabled later if the lock needs to be taken (i.e. we are not nested). John Ogness