linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Subject: [PATCH] VFS: use synchronize_rcu_expedited() in namespace_unlock()
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:26:37 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y3nyd4pu.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]


The synchronize_rcu() in namespace_unlock() is called every time
a filesystem is unmounted.  If a great many filesystems are mounted,
this can cause a noticable slow-down in, for example, system shutdown.

The sequence:
  mkdir -p /tmp/Mtest/{0..5000}
  time for i in /tmp/Mtest/*; do mount -t tmpfs tmpfs $i ; done
  time umount /tmp/Mtest/*

on a 4-cpu VM can report 8 seconds to mount the tmpfs filesystems, and
100 seconds to unmount them.

Boot the same VM with 1 CPU and it takes 18 seconds to mount the
tmpfs filesystems, but only 36 to unmount.

If we change the synchronize_rcu() to synchronize_rcu_expedited()
the umount time on a 4-cpu VM is 8 seconds to mount and 0.6 to
unmount.

I think this 200-fold speed up is worth the slightly higher system
impact of use synchronize_rcu_expedited().

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
---

Cc: to Paul and Josh in case they'll correct me if using _expedited()
is really bad here.

Thanks,
NeilBrown


 fs/namespace.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 3b601f115b6c..fce91c447fab 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@ static void namespace_unlock(void)
 	if (likely(hlist_empty(&head)))
 		return;
 
-	synchronize_rcu();
+	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
 
 	group_pin_kill(&head);
 }
-- 
2.14.0.rc0.dirty


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-26  2:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-26  2:26 NeilBrown [this message]
2017-10-26 12:27 ` [PATCH] VFS: use synchronize_rcu_expedited() in namespace_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-26 13:50   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-27  0:45   ` NeilBrown
2017-10-27  1:24     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-27 11:27   ` Florian Weimer
2017-11-27 14:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-11-28 22:17       ` NeilBrown
2018-10-05  1:27         ` [PATCH - resend] " NeilBrown
2018-10-05  1:40           ` Al Viro
2018-10-05  2:53             ` NeilBrown
2018-10-05  4:08             ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-11-29 23:33             ` [PATCH - resend*2] " NeilBrown
2018-11-29 23:52               ` Al Viro
2018-11-30  1:09                 ` NeilBrown
2018-11-06  3:15           ` [PATCH - resend] " NeilBrown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y3nyd4pu.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).