From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756021AbcG0MrB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:47:01 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33488 "EHLO
	mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754421AbcG0Mq7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Jul 2016 08:46:59 -0400
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 24.5.1
From: Mathieu OTHACEHE <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
Cc: Mathieu OTHACEHE <m.othacehe@gmail.com>, johan@kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] usb: serial: ti_usb_3410_5052: Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc
Message-ID: <87y44nntdn.fsf@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <1469606944.2408.0.camel@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:46:32 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> in that case, where is the initialisation to 0 you avoid and hence
> can remove from the code?

Hi,

In v1, kzalloc was useful to avoid wFlags initialisation to 0 :

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/12/139

In v2 wFlags initialisation has be removed so this patch has no purpose
anymore, my bad.

Thanks,

Mathieu