From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org>
Cc: Jun Li <jun.li@nxp.com>, Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"r.baldyga\@samsung.com" <r.baldyga@samsung.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"patches\@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"device-mainlining\@lists.linuxfoundation.org"
<device-mainlining@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:18:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y48zgogi.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMz4kuJhrfE_6s2y9Cdo8t3Z3mvKf9rYs-kkRfBFD_SNL7pv=g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2883 bytes --]
Hi,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 30 March 2016 at 19:24, Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Seems you don't want to guarantee charger type detection is done
>>>> >> >> > before gadget connection(pullup DP), right?
>>>> >> >> > I see you call usb_charger_detect_type() in each gadget usb
>>>> >> >> > state
>>>> >> >> changes.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I am not sure I get your point correctly, please correct me if I
>>>> >> >> misunderstand you.
>>>> >> >> We need to check the charger type at every event comes from the
>>>> >> >> usb gadget state changes or the extcon device state changes, which
>>>> >> >> means a new charger plugin or pullup.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > According to usb charger spec, my understanding is you can't do
>>>> >> > real charger detection procedure *after* gadget _connection_(pullup
>>>> >> > DP), also I don't
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Why can not? Charger detection is usually from PMIC.
>>>> >
>>>> > Charger detection process will impact DP/DM line state, see usb
>>>> > charger spec v1.2 for detail detection process, section 4.6.3 says:
>>>> >
>>>> > "A PD is allowed to *disconnect* and repeat the charger detection
>>>> > process multiple times while attached. The PD is required to wait for
>>>> > a time of at least TCP_VDM_EN max between disconnecting and restarting
>>>> > the charger detection process."
>>>> >
>>>> > As Peter mentioned, the charger detection should happen between VBUS
>>>> > detection and gadget pull up DP for first plug in case. So when&after
>>>> > gadget connect (pullup DP), you should already know the charger type.
>>>>
>>>> Make sense. In our company's solution, charger detection can be done by
>>>> hardware from PMIC at first, then it will not affect the DP/DM line when
>>>> gadget starts to enumeration.
>>>
>>> I see, charger type detection is done automatically by PMIC when VBUS
>>> is detected in your case, you just assume the process is complete
>>
>> assuming this finishes before gadget starts is a bad idea. It would've
>> been much more robust to delay usb_gadget_connect() until we KNOW
>> charger detection has completed.
>
> It is hardware action to detect the charger type quickly. It actually
> *gets* the charger type and does not means *detect* charger type in
> 'usb_charger_detect_type()' function. Maybe I need to change the
> function name as 'usb_charger_get_type()'.
yes.
> If some udc drivers want to detect charger type in
> 'gadget->ops->get_charger_type()' callback, they should avoid
> impacting DP/DM line state at the right gadget state. Thanks.
they shouldn't detect is get_type(), the semantics doesn't work. If, at
some point, we have to do SW detection of the charger, then a new
->charger_detect() method will have to be added.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 12:35 [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation Baolin Wang
2016-03-24 12:35 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework Baolin Wang
2016-04-23 19:53 ` Pavel Machek
2016-04-24 5:32 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-24 12:35 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] gadget: Support for " Baolin Wang
2016-03-27 1:29 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-24 12:35 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] gadget: Integrate with the usb gadget supporting for usb charger Baolin Wang
2016-03-24 12:35 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] power: wm831x_power: Support USB charger current limit management Baolin Wang
2016-03-27 2:08 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-27 8:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-28 6:45 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-25 7:09 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the usb gadget power negotation Peter Chen
2016-03-28 6:51 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-28 7:13 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-28 9:09 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-29 0:32 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-29 2:05 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-29 17:14 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-29 17:23 ` Mark Brown
2016-03-30 2:05 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-30 7:07 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-30 7:42 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-30 8:40 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-30 9:19 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-30 9:32 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-29 8:45 ` Jun Li
2016-03-29 9:48 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-30 2:54 ` Jun Li
2016-03-30 6:15 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-30 8:07 ` Jun Li
2016-03-30 9:30 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-30 10:58 ` Jun Li
2016-03-30 11:24 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-31 5:33 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-31 6:18 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-03-31 6:35 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-31 5:22 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-31 6:12 ` Jun Li
2016-03-31 6:37 ` Baolin Wang
2016-03-31 8:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-03-31 8:24 ` Baolin Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y48zgogi.fsf@intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=device-mainlining@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=jun.li@nxp.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=r.baldyga@samsung.com \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox