From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751901AbbCLDGu (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:06:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:43748 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751136AbbCLDGq (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 23:06:46 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pawel Moll Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_mmio: generation support In-Reply-To: <1425593244-18869-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1425593244-18869-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:37:49 +1030 Message-ID: <87y4n3vuh6.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > virtio_mmio currently lacks generation support which > makes multi-byte field access racy. > Fix by getting the value at offset 0xfc for version 2 > devices. Nothing we can do for version 1, so return > generation id 0. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > --- > > Pawel, you mentioned you have a working virtio 1.0 > hypervisor, can you pls confirm this works correctly? I've applied this one, but fixed it to compile: > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c > index 0375456..69b2e4d 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c > @@ -237,6 +237,16 @@ static void vm_set(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned offset, > } > } > > +static u32 vm_generation(struct virtio_device *vdev) > +{ > + struct virtio_mmio_device *vm_dev = to_virtio_mmio_device(vdev); > + > + if (vm_dev->version == 1) > + return 0; > + else > + return readl(vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_CONFIG_GENERATION); > +} > + > static u8 vm_get_status(struct virtio_device *vdev) > { > struct virtio_mmio_device *vm_dev = to_virtio_mmio_device(vdev); > @@ -503,6 +513,8 @@ static const char *vm_bus_name(struct virtio_device *vdev) > static const struct virtio_config_ops virtio_mmio_config_ops = { > .get = vm_get, > .set = vm_set, > + .generation = vm_generation, > + .get_status = vm_get_status, > .get_status = vm_get_status, See the double-assingment of get_status? Thanks, Rusty. PS. Sorry, that *does* actually compile. I wish it didn't though...