From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] virtio: correct the memory barrier in virtqueue_kick_prepare()
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:04:17 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5szfh1i.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120122114757.GD27222@redhat.com>
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:47:57 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 04:17:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Use virtio_mb() to make sure the available index to be exposed before
> > checking the the avail event. Otherwise we may get stale value of
> > avail event in guest and never kick the host after.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>
> Good catch.
> Note: this fixes a bug introduced by ee7cd8981e15bcb365fc762afe3fc47b8242f630.
Indeed, great catch. It replaces the missing barrier, and after some
careful thought I've convinced myself that it is necessary for both the
avail index and flag cases.
> > START_USE(vq);
> > - /* Descriptors and available array need to be set before we expose the
> > - * new available array entries. */
> > - virtio_wmb(vq);
> > + /* We need expose available array entries before checking avail
>
> Nit:
> We need expose -> Need to expose
>
> > + * event. */
> > + virtio_mb(vq);
Fixed typo and applied.
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-22 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 8:16 [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix typos of memory barriers Jason Wang
2012-01-20 8:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] virtio: correct the memory barrier in virtqueue_kick_prepare() Jason Wang
2012-01-22 11:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-22 23:34 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-01-22 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix typos of memory barriers Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-22 23:07 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y5szfh1i.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox