From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756839Ab0EDKOL (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 06:14:11 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:33955 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750782Ab0EDKOK (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 May 2010 06:14:10 -0400 To: Kent Overstreet Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Bcache: version 4 From: Andi Kleen References: <20100501001212.GA31135@moria> Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 12:14:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100501001212.GA31135@moria> (Kent Overstreet's message of "Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:12:13 -0800") Message-ID: <87y6g03rf8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kent Overstreet writes: > I've got some documentation incorporated since the last posting. The > user documentation should be sufficient; the code could probably use > more but it's hard for me to say what, so I'll try and add whatever > people find unclear. I read all of this email now and I still have no clue what exactly a 'bcache' is and why anyone would want one (and if one needs a large stick to handle it or not) Normally the 0/x series of a patch kit is supposed to contain that information. I know it's probably obvious to you, but it's not to most other readers. Consider adding some introduction? -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.