From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756685AbYLFIz5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 03:55:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752053AbYLFIzs (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 03:55:48 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:53143 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751250AbYLFIzr (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2008 03:55:47 -0500 To: Andrey Borzenkov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is vm86old no more implemented? From: Andi Kleen References: <200812061043.51438.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:56:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200812061043.51438.arvidjaar@mail.ru> (Andrey Borzenkov's message of "Sat, 6 Dec 2008 10:43:50 +0300") Message-ID: <87y6ytvg0s.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrey Borzenkov writes: > > CONFIG_VM86 is defined; is there anything else that is needed? This fails > both in 2.6.27.7 and in 2.6.28-rc7. I attach config from 2.6.28-rc7. It should still work. Can you double check you're running the correct kernel? Perhaps a 64bit kernel (which doesn't implement it). -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com