* Possible partial miss in pages needed for zone's memory map?
@ 2008-05-17 12:19 Johannes Weiner
2008-05-20 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Weiner @ 2008-05-17 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi,
I stumbled over the following in the zone initialization code. Please
let me know if I overlooked something here.
---
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Don't drop a partial page in a zone's memory map size
In a zone's present pages number, account for all pages occupied by the
memory map, including a partial.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
---
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3378,7 +3378,8 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_
* is used by this zone for memmap. This affects the watermark
* and per-cpu initialisations
*/
- memmap_pages = (size * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ memmap_pages =
+ PAGE_ALIGN(size * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
if (realsize >= memmap_pages) {
realsize -= memmap_pages;
printk(KERN_DEBUG
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Possible partial miss in pages needed for zone's memory map?
2008-05-17 12:19 Possible partial miss in pages needed for zone's memory map? Johannes Weiner
@ 2008-05-20 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 7:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2008-05-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Weiner; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-mm
On Sat, 17 May 2008 14:19:15 +0200 Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I stumbled over the following in the zone initialization code. Please
> let me know if I overlooked something here.
>
hm, no takers. Let's add linux-mm.
>
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> Subject: [PATCH] Don't drop a partial page in a zone's memory map size
>
> In a zone's present pages number, account for all pages occupied by the
> memory map, including a partial.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> ---
>
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -3378,7 +3378,8 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_
> * is used by this zone for memmap. This affects the watermark
> * and per-cpu initialisations
> */
> - memmap_pages = (size * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + memmap_pages =
> + PAGE_ALIGN(size * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> if (realsize >= memmap_pages) {
> realsize -= memmap_pages;
> printk(KERN_DEBUG
I looked in there for 30 seconds and collapsed in confusion over which
variables are in which units.
Hint: never ever name a variable or a /proc file or your cat
or anything else anything dimensionless like "size". It can always be
replaced with something which communicates its units. zones_nrbytes,
zholes_nrpages, etc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Possible partial miss in pages needed for zone's memory map?
2008-05-20 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2008-05-20 7:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki @ 2008-05-20 7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Johannes Weiner, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-mm
On Mon, 19 May 2008 23:19:37 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 May 2008 14:19:15 +0200 Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I stumbled over the following in the zone initialization code. Please
> > let me know if I overlooked something here.
> >
>
> hm, no takers. Let's add linux-mm.
>
> >
> > From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> > Subject: [PATCH] Don't drop a partial page in a zone's memory map size
> >
> > In a zone's present pages number, account for all pages occupied by the
> > memory map, including a partial.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> > ---
> >
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -3378,7 +3378,8 @@ static void __paginginit free_area_init_
> > * is used by this zone for memmap. This affects the watermark
> > * and per-cpu initialisations
> > */
> > - memmap_pages = (size * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > + memmap_pages =
> > + PAGE_ALIGN(size * sizeof(struct page)) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > if (realsize >= memmap_pages) {
> > realsize -= memmap_pages;
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG
>
> I looked in there for 30 seconds and collapsed in confusion over which
> variables are in which units.
>
Hmm, size * sizeof(struct page) is multiple of PAGE_SIZE in many case.
Becasue "size" is always alinged to (1 << MAX_ORDER -1) (I believe...).
ex.) In x86 case,
(1 << (MAX_ORDER(11) - 1)) * 4 (sizeof(long)) = (1 << 12) = PAGE_SIZE.
But not sure on other archs with various params.
I think above fix is correct.
Thanks,
-Kame
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-20 6:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-17 12:19 Possible partial miss in pages needed for zone's memory map? Johannes Weiner
2008-05-20 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-20 7:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox