From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/12] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 01:06:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zf6nnoiv.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aWAjU_QS7kwcyCse@willie-the-truck>
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2025 at 08:49:09PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> Support waiting in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() via
>> __cmpwait_relaxed(). To ensure that we wake from waiting in
>> WFE periodically and don't block forever if there are no stores
>> to ptr, this path is only used when the event-stream is enabled.
>>
>> Note that when using __cmpwait_relaxed() we ignore the timeout
>> value, allowing an overshoot by upto the event-stream period.
>> And, in the unlikely event that the event-stream is unavailable,
>> fallback to spin-waiting.
>>
>> Also set SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT to 1 so we do the time-check in
>> each iteration of smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout().
>>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Suggested-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> - cpu_poll_relax() now takes an additional parameter.
>>
>> - added a comment detailing why we define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT=1 and
>> how it ties up with smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout().
>>
>> - explicitly include <asm/vdso/processor.h> for cpu_relax().
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
>> index 9495c4441a46..6190e178db51 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> #include <linux/kasan-checks.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/alternative-macros.h>
>> +#include <asm/vdso/processor.h>
>>
>> #define __nops(n) ".rept " #n "\nnop\n.endr\n"
>> #define nops(n) asm volatile(__nops(n))
>> @@ -219,6 +220,26 @@ do { \
>> (typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
>> })
>>
>> +/* Re-declared here to avoid include dependency. */
>> +extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * In the common case, cpu_poll_relax() sits waiting in __cmpwait_relaxed()
>> + * for the ptr value to change.
>> + *
>> + * Since this period is reasonably long, choose SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
>> + * to be 1, so smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() does a
>> + * time-check in each iteration.
>> + */
>> +#define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT 1
>> +
>> +#define cpu_poll_relax(ptr, val, timeout_ns) do { \
>> + if (arch_timer_evtstrm_available()) \
>> + __cmpwait_relaxed(ptr, val); \
>> + else \
>> + cpu_relax(); \
>> +} while (0)
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Thanks!
--
ankur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-15 4:49 [PATCH v8 00/12] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-22 7:47 ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-01-08 21:36 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 9:06 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 17:59 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-19 4:52 ` kernel test robot
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-01-08 21:35 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 9:05 ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-09 14:16 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 18:55 ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-09 14:17 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 19:05 ` Ankur Arora
2026-01-20 13:58 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-20 22:49 ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 5:14 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-01-09 14:11 ` Will Deacon
2026-01-09 19:06 ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 21:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-12-16 7:34 ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 4:49 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 11:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-16 6:55 ` Ankur Arora
2025-12-15 21:23 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zf6nnoiv.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox