From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A32332FA0DF; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763051010; cv=none; b=VaFftQX0YlZQytRvRBiafLw/x1KBfiNYYhNdbqvojQdx3wJ1kc/L9ZAv2z2Ae6SiBmfz+crsSLmGPMFu35OYSlCs6fFu0kAGdKLMUphqXS4XLNt9ZnbIhz7vhgV7ny7vi0IJ08ftlEVKgNhDSDOnxK1iKQdlxTU8niW5oGGuOrI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763051010; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dLXeMjiHSAYDPdv9Oj5HzR2G1lpt4tZguXdVnlGhItE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=XKxafqAXYNAxHOgf6D3dVplBdqSZhJDRCezzlXouS+OnwWeFP8OfyfYYBkCV0Mf+Jpb1fLO83KSIJPDdEj/8qChtGwB5s5z61HtF1V3X5QRGWV+1rEBLVZSDSSlDDCb/xGPNudx7NAa98MSAX+RR86nDEi5yFFPP/wn3vVIjzvo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=qoM1Eg+J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="qoM1Eg+J" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net D304E40AFB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1763051008; bh=/qbOpckfr4I1TzUl02iFc2NyThhKntgkUDfqtbPDH9A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=qoM1Eg+JB8ZMaXypRU3teSgtcnRdsLvDSCTmJ73YO19OJE/ztKt6BFMnyAFO7HQaj 7LfiCsO0a+3rjtGJ3w25FO7zXYzlU7psqoveOjZv7Ilg88faDwrDucQ7YYRi0ngY5x a6ZDo4v0kikI0iVRCdfIbpmzXcZaYSX/0IfsS0MxkKiCphl9Ug33GkIPI2yeUip/N3 Q6BRBPV9ee6TJnwvgH5VYLao1521SdCD22sRiLY4mSuynMSUAk3YQsqf/4G9ICro5E W7VZfGpnHgvwbDGX29dsAQxWeSmhNu0+yf9zgnhOXDyu7Eecf32lJJ5va73MiuP4wD a4loFvC/i6cCQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D304E40AFB; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:23:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jason Wang , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of Linus' tree In-Reply-To: <20251113091604.0a02f3bc@foz.lan> References: <20251113125537.0d08e5ce@canb.auug.org.au> <20251113091604.0a02f3bc@foz.lan> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:23:27 -0700 Message-ID: <87zf8psxz4.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > Em Thu, 13 Nov 2025 12:55:37 +1100 > Stephen Rothwell escreveu: > >> Hi all, >> >> Today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced these warnings: >> >> WARNING: /home/sfr/kernels/next/next/include/linux/virtio_config.h:174 duplicate section name 'Return' >> WARNING: /home/sfr/kernels/next/next/include/linux/virtio_config.h:184 duplicate section name 'Return' >> WARNING: /home/sfr/kernels/next/next/include/linux/virtio_config.h:190 duplicate section name 'Return' >> >> Introduced by commit >> >> bee8c7c24b73 ("virtio: introduce map ops in virtio core") >> >> but is probably a bug in our scripts as those lines above have "Returns:" >> in them, not "Return:". > > It is not a mistake. What happens is that, when kernel-doc detects > something like: > > /** > ... > * return: something > ... > * returns: else > ... > */ > > we have a duplicated section. This seems like something we should be able to fix...will try to find some time to look into it... jon