From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94901A57C5 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2024 14:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722522515; cv=none; b=FUF0zUsUTfed3j4Y3UncRJiYRiI+Z7u6j7hGYDM5sXELoA7GW4bt9Ipac6Us6IbE7EEFFjLHHCO9tUs7/b+Gv4jrCY73T06lhgnb7CsOCaqNETWoXStpfLev2kZkMLaWjy9xQX6zDRyQQlZCTJ087mj7+x33iGC+VoPRS1qpTNs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722522515; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IIQ5uRwYXhoY3X2ooGCX30n8xR3R9831eLGQsegoiWE=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aglCwb+b+lw/xCkYjtZEHZam29hee4sV0t5xjadydIdtMG2Z0KRjr5/Y09/2qeS7H7fmlYF5dIQAPVmkvVCMy32MMJEOLgaogFXmNs8gC4uW6QlGnZePChGmH/GqL9gYQqlycmC+XuWmYzkVOOvyirLFoow3BkLODctKAjzM4SA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=YaJtkggl; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=8SRgewnh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="YaJtkggl"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="8SRgewnh" From: John Ogness DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1722522512; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IIQ5uRwYXhoY3X2ooGCX30n8xR3R9831eLGQsegoiWE=; b=YaJtkgglPssTF6lKCViNqI0lvCwRJqTAwPbnlo6rT4qz+2GQupGefTP4MfyV2sqS60jn9C ofbCKyBDMDaAb0MEQ5nwYROoA8vCkx8TGHLHeJWs6XO7qVC7DY1auIwkEfeljJGns0fDWE +mM8hTGzlaf/NRFU3P9hWjrDftDzDasj5nJWHpyZ/wJ7Tcb2Ij5DZlQq4yBpuabm9IAwqV SWS/qgfRD+8Q3KClKe+EaIZz4opB46JroGz9vqAlh6hR/vJtol4gpVhzJ+ImUzIjq5ksou OMLuipseA6+l68dAFU+646t0bI/OTjHXx6Oq06qdBLFea48xK9WmzOPI5HQOhA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1722522512; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IIQ5uRwYXhoY3X2ooGCX30n8xR3R9831eLGQsegoiWE=; b=8SRgewnhoFhfMIxvgWvp+pLp+3Wpt89xZ3dqNs28rkUAK+kUvWfLZIWEjuUuSrKnAc9Ogn P5dbywfp+U27s0Cw== To: Jocelyn Falempe , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Javier Martinez Canillas , "Guilherme G . Piccoli" , bluescreen_avenger@verizon.net, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] drm/log: Introduce a new boot logger to draw the kmsg on the screen In-Reply-To: References: <20240801100640.462606-1-jfalempe@redhat.com> <20240801100640.462606-4-jfalempe@redhat.com> <87o76czfb2.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:34:31 +0206 Message-ID: <87zfpwxqpc.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-08-01, Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > I think I can also register one console for each drm driver, which > will simplify drm_log even further. (currently it would mean having a > circular buffer and work function for each driver which is a bit too > much). Indeed. > Do you know if there is a chance to have write_thread() in 6.12 or > 6.13 ? Sorry, I have no crystal ball. Petr Mladek and I are working really hard to get things in shape for mainline. I do think there is a chance for the 6.12 merge window. But it would also need to get past Linus. Our recent atomic console efforts were rejected [0] for the 6.11 merge window. We are working to get that series in shape for 6.12 in parallel. John [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whU_woFnFN-3Jv2hNCmwLg_fkrT42AWwxm-=Ha5BmNX4w@mail.gmail.com