From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2490E158D9A; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715090517; cv=none; b=YgofaOlMuGOE/3euIyCHN5Imyp+W3rYV4RzRBlM/rsJGm6u1Agwm86rhRpNsR96MgRVcc025/z28XJSNC32BmntXlIpdpOU9XbWQopM0osoxzGIHrCFZ9JiOOw2P0meZOSBSI10vYq2sBmtHS854e35l5BP5nMGRTR5ibxK3YcE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715090517; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I8Jh/c0O3HmeTvddNyCG+LPiNook2RF0dJ160XS3vEE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kbwYnCe6ftBfl5WfBy40DEyGRA8+0tEYWBMt8213u0KMn34IzPGfOv+FCJei+CzhhsPCG2cvIS+J1dfPXlFIlDInty6qdwl+Bp40wXfQjNktlHL0SGs8lL4PXmj20kiHiZ6hsmaXcJQqkljtFxZDxtAihQzxqdcohWKcFqu7auo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=SRwLjig1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="SRwLjig1" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 6785247C42 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1715090515; bh=v8zpDZ52eJJsgwnWvpCntsojxBM4sw48U0a8jeYBkJU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=SRwLjig1A4b9jYCSZ43z5CULRf48H3strCTKj15I7/JjCqzo9uoTeVSy+nTIp/PMx f1nB9w5FFFySKx67fnvolXM5Q9vpGea3B1Ot2sdh2raJ1BYHhs44mfkTiE+jMPt6ZX 7yUcOosRU+CP59izZcjoPa/DGctwmNbA+bcvwAzLuuGHM8H5bPRf9iLm3JJVtHIlzJ gYATyXtEUFmZ1kKQgtN06WQV2QQKLBW9UsA2Kw90VLvuc4eEhIhNVffSsc6UEX2JNH AcTrikbDSHFa7VIvtFY3HjuWazJJHHDum2exmiHRpwc/Tqb4n3/PTFw+polvai3wVu y1EXwEx2K5nzg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6785247C42; Tue, 7 May 2024 14:01:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Dennis Lam , chris@chrisdown.name Cc: Dennis Lam , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs:core-api: fixed typos and grammar in printk-index page In-Reply-To: <20240502212522.4263-1-dennis.lamerice@gmail.com> References: <20240502212522.4263-1-dennis.lamerice@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 08:01:54 -0600 Message-ID: <87zft1g1pp.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Dennis Lam writes: > Signed-off-by: Dennis Lam > --- > Documentation/core-api/printk-index.rst | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/printk-index.rst b/Documentation/core-api/printk-index.rst > index 3062f37d119b..1979c5dd32fe 100644 > --- a/Documentation/core-api/printk-index.rst > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/printk-index.rst > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > Printk Index > ============ > > -There are many ways how to monitor the state of the system. One important > +There are many ways to monitor the state of the system. One important > source of information is the system log. It provides a lot of information, > including more or less important warnings and error messages. > > @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ their own wrappers adding __printk_index_emit(). > > Only few subsystem specific wrappers have been updated so far, > for example, dev_printk(). As a result, the printk formats from > -some subsystes can be missing in the printk index. > +some subsystems can be missing in the printk index. > Applied, thanks. jon