From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FCED181BA1; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712784460; cv=none; b=QwwLYd7DE4cmzpvK6IIV/XTWzmLoBVYW13K1CdSdgEuf9MI/metlwog7Y6geyzbgfouazXOHXbJ0D+xqoC9qzGs0XJhEO40syzxiI09qhonRLTrfmarsacmIeNEF5OrySBA6gptojLyLLwGc28CN3bhrz7jKVsTEa9CfduRZgBo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712784460; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SOU/rQZS2o+jKf46j6gyPHpdHQ1JeR3VtxetWOGthQo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QP2lGbtgHrIidLk+wmwiGvgX0DujuitmNr92zQY+W5aVZbqNBh700v7MltPZLtVgXZsLdHXPQ3VLnQjk8idF6GN9lNnW4rjPYplZc1kjAIuyXR2BmDktWiijPYUQ6+39peMMEXfLZ7hvTpvjGLuMWKLyko2heuDKpZbRy2gpGR4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=AznARsNl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="AznARsNl" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 2B86C47C26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1712784458; bh=2h0mCjUz+lkc6cFoDOOjKY+TGil3wNwGsaSJv8rWfNQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=AznARsNlSmERn5KPFpkzeAVfvk7ZZTgSWFON+3Nt0MzBvzvqbLc+3rbbowmPD6y0t l31C65IPtWlwcu5S5+kfQaHaYvbSsYjIkYDBZh6cZPPenzlWC7E0uk3ApjdQGGw9U+ vLx7jKQcH2M+5k89wd6Y4IS0i7EbNQnBMQLcV7rlsTgcpiZTdnW9qjm9pXFZw14Or2 M4LJVIslbkY2504d226tTHN1+q9zqk6j32wGzQcy4hLdBIhDOsaPjtLxdznJLPSFXH dRR45/dwVXjnFby/N5aV7Ss5gTTvcUG6ndPbRvpqBws/K8hzRzJz74vwV0VTBwhTAA K9t+nRnuDIegA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625:67c:16ff:fe81:5f9b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B86C47C26; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Haoyang Liu , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si Cc: hust-os-kernel-patches@googlegroups.com, Haoyang Liu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs/zh_CN: Add dev-tools/kmemleak Chinese translation In-Reply-To: <20240403052552.39292-1-tttturtleruss@hust.edu.cn> References: <20240403052552.39292-1-tttturtleruss@hust.edu.cn> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 15:27:36 -0600 Message-ID: <87zfu0sybb.fsf@meer.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Haoyang Liu writes: > Translate dev-tools/kmemleak.rst into Chinese and add it into > zh_CN/dev-tools/index.rst. > > Signed-off-by: Haoyang Liu > --- > v1 -> v2: Adjust line length and keep consistent with the original content > > .../translations/zh_CN/dev-tools/index.rst | 2 +- > .../translations/zh_CN/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst | 229 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_CN/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst Applied, thanks. Incidentally, I see you sent a v3 adding just the reviewed-by tag. If you change a patch for other reasons, you should definitely add such tags (assuming the change isn't one that requires re-review, of course), but there is no need to send a new version just to be sure that the tag is picked up - b4 is great for that. jon