From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp (mail.parknet.co.jp [210.171.160.6]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E96134AD; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.171.160.6 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708677171; cv=none; b=JW/Z1vuwrnublDDXKqKH+bI/C3HBqlsI6JIoVW325mpdHRA61uoRUufnEE3UA+3Fc+QMjJzsLuCxCfIzC6PzkFYeQcc5pG7nS3CdTIDODFWxs4SyAFRCd2W7Ua/711waMeRkX57i4tMKdEDzxJuF0BYyB1ilIpgQL9qI+bNFYUQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708677171; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2uCLZV0OXklY47DP/SXA/CmaNI0k3CXjhriIgHeMr3s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nCf3THooRVZUw2hC74iVu8tQKF4gZy3Vg1ezeY0bn8GhIQkEIHEghSwOkVZUvcpoAfW0Giwo5WlK+CulqSh+IXrVLi8fRK1ZcLBp/QY6jIMb7SLSV35hVM0+AnpQgm6JXpsKsPTl0Mq6j50DlGv1iq3ubHqrc8eR/+GAx9+kj5k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=parknet.co.jp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=210.171.160.6 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mail.parknet.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=parknet.co.jp Received: from ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (server.parknet.ne.jp [210.171.168.39]) by mail.parknet.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81E15233CCB7; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:32:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@devron.myhome.or.jp [192.168.0.3]) by ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-1) with ESMTPS id 41N8WlwD212563 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:32:48 +0900 Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-1) with ESMTPS id 41N8Wl0S1008245 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:32:47 +0900 Received: (from hirofumi@localhost) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.18.1/8.18.1/Submit) id 41N8WlWk1008244; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:32:47 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Gwendal Grignou , dlunev@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: ignore .. subdir and always add a link to dirs In-Reply-To: <874jdzpov7.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> (OGAWA Hirofumi's message of "Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:27:08 +0900") References: <20240222203013.2649457-1-cascardo@igalia.com> <87bk88oskz.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <874jdzpov7.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:32:47 +0900 Message-ID: <87zfvroa1c.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain OGAWA Hirofumi writes: > OK. > > If you want to add the workaround for this, it must emulate the correct > format. I.e. sane link count even if without "."/"..". And furthermore > it works for any operations. Of course, it must not affect the correct format. And it should not accept the other really corrupted format. -- OGAWA Hirofumi