From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E404FC433EF for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD24E61056 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233859AbhJMMzD (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:55:03 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:44017 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231294AbhJMMzB (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:55:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634129578; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EDsOoxW6EgtFgX4OT23FEb36jHTKMtrgphgk3Epw6BM=; b=IycEkUZMrJ9b89yKS9324D3Bc2GpnnuByQwzrQR72QMeJhr57SlOMN6eeyQ08f91PQGqM/ O/zQlIvbPyMw0D0PLPdurmRtdw+f7ZYyBqBuTZVBsxojhgV/gfcPaQUsc37Ffgd5P6fnvi hVD1hRMr2P64tAILNhSguabyNBK1YHM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-574-_kjdl3s9NGCosEq6_R0ySg-1; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:52:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _kjdl3s9NGCosEq6_R0ySg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C7F19200C4; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.193.85]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6286C5DA60; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:52:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Cornelia Huck To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Christian Borntraeger Cc: Halil Pasic , Jason Wang , Xie Yongji , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, markver@us.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com, Raphael Norwitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] virtio: write back F_VERSION_1 before validate In-Reply-To: <20211013081836-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Organization: Red Hat GmbH References: <20211011053921.1198936-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20211013060923-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <96561e29-e0d6-9a4d-3657-999bad59914e@de.ibm.com> <20211013081836-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.32.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgrdulwp.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 13 2021, "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Can we get this kernel patch queued for 5.15 and stable without waiting for the QEMU patch >> as we have a regression with 4.14? > > Probably. Still trying to decide between this and plain revert for 5.15 > and back. Maybe both? Probably better queue this one, in case we have some undiscovered problems with the config space access in virtio-net?