From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>,
"Kunihiko Hayashi" <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 17:57:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgt8p09n.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823150927.jhobzfxy6e4s663r@pali>
On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:09:27 +0100,
Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> + Marc (who originally reported this issue)
>
> On Monday 23 August 2021 20:18:20 Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> > The condition register PCI_RCV_INTX is used in irq_mask(), irq_unmask()
> > and irq_ack() callbacks. Accesses to register can occur at the same time
> > without a lock.
> > Add a lock into each callback to prevent the issue.
> >
> > Fixes: 7e6d5cd88a6f ("PCI: uniphier: Add UniPhier PCIe host controller support")
> > Suggested-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com>
>
> Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > The previous patch is as follows:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/1629370566-29984-1-git-send-email-hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com/
> >
> > Changes in the previous patch:
> > - Change the subject and commit message
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> > index ebe43e9..5075714 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-uniphier.c
> > @@ -186,12 +186,17 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> > +
> > val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> > val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_STATUS;
> > val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_STATUS_SHIFT);
> > writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> > @@ -199,12 +204,17 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> > struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> > +
> > val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> > val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> > val |= BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
This looks extremely suspicious. You clear all the INTX mask bits, and
only set the one you need. How about the pre-existing bits?
> > writel(val, priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> > +
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->lock, flags);
> > }
> >
> > static void uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> > @@ -212,12 +222,17 @@ static void uniphier_pcie_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> > struct pcie_port *pp = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > struct uniphier_pcie_priv *priv = to_uniphier_pcie(pci);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->lock, flags);
> > +
> > val = readl(priv->base + PCL_RCV_INTX);
> > val &= ~PCL_RCV_INTX_ALL_MASK;
> > val &= ~BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) + PCL_RCV_INTX_MASK_SHIFT);
And by the same token, this second line is totally useless.
I think masking/unmasking is broken in this driver, locking or not.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 11:18 [PATCH] PCI: uniphier: Serialize INTx masking/unmasking Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-23 15:09 ` Pali Rohár
2021-08-23 16:57 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-08-25 0:01 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
2021-08-25 9:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-08-26 10:02 ` Kunihiko Hayashi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgt8p09n.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hayashi.kunihiko@socionext.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox