From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [printk] 18a2dc6982: ltp.kmsg01.fail
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 13:23:07 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zh89kkek.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709111310.GD11164@alley>
On 2020-07-09, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> I though more about it. IMHO, it will be better to modify
> prb_first_seq() to do the same cycle as prb_next_seq()
> and return seq number of the first valid entry.
Exactly!
Here is a patch that does just that. I added a prb_first_valid_seq()
function and made prb_first_seq() static. (The ringbuffer still needs
prb_first_seq() for itself.)
John Ogness
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 0b1337f4188c..fec71229169e 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -775,9 +775,9 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
logbuf_lock_irq();
}
- if (user->seq < prb_first_seq(prb)) {
+ if (user->seq < prb_first_valid_seq(prb)) {
/* our last seen message is gone, return error and reset */
- user->seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+ user->seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
ret = -EPIPE;
logbuf_unlock_irq();
goto out;
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static loff_t devkmsg_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
switch (whence) {
case SEEK_SET:
/* the first record */
- user->seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+ user->seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
break;
case SEEK_DATA:
/*
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ static __poll_t devkmsg_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
logbuf_lock_irq();
if (prb_read_valid(prb, user->seq, NULL)) {
/* return error when data has vanished underneath us */
- if (user->seq < prb_first_seq(prb))
+ if (user->seq < prb_first_valid_seq(prb))
ret = EPOLLIN|EPOLLRDNORM|EPOLLERR|EPOLLPRI;
else
ret = EPOLLIN|EPOLLRDNORM;
@@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int devkmsg_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
&user->dict_buf[0], sizeof(user->dict_buf));
logbuf_lock_irq();
- user->seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+ user->seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
logbuf_unlock_irq();
file->private_data = user;
@@ -1631,9 +1631,9 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, int source)
/* Number of chars in the log buffer */
case SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD:
logbuf_lock_irq();
- if (syslog_seq < prb_first_seq(prb)) {
+ if (syslog_seq < prb_first_valid_seq(prb)) {
/* messages are gone, move to first one */
- syslog_seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+ syslog_seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
syslog_partial = 0;
}
if (source == SYSLOG_FROM_PROC) {
@@ -2120,7 +2120,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(printk);
#define printk_time false
#define prb_read_valid(rb, seq, r) false
-#define prb_first_seq(rb) 0
+#define prb_first_valid_seq(rb) 0
static u64 syslog_seq;
static u64 console_seq;
@@ -2627,7 +2627,7 @@ void console_flush_on_panic(enum con_flush_mode mode)
unsigned long flags;
logbuf_lock_irqsave(flags);
- console_seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+ console_seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
logbuf_unlock_irqrestore(flags);
}
console_unlock();
@@ -3395,9 +3395,9 @@ bool kmsg_dump_get_buffer(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper, bool syslog,
goto out;
logbuf_lock_irqsave(flags);
- if (dumper->cur_seq < prb_first_seq(prb)) {
+ if (dumper->cur_seq < prb_first_valid_seq(prb)) {
/* messages are gone, move to first available one */
- dumper->cur_seq = prb_first_seq(prb);
+ dumper->cur_seq = prb_first_valid_seq(prb);
}
/* last entry */
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
index f4a670f7289d..70ad5a091e96 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
@@ -1420,22 +1420,8 @@ static int prb_read(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 seq,
return desc_read_committed_seq(desc_ring, id, seq, &desc);
}
-/**
- * prb_first_seq() - Get the sequence number of the tail descriptor.
- *
- * @rb: The ringbuffer to get the sequence number from.
- *
- * This is the public function available to readers to see what the
- * first/oldest sequence number is.
- *
- * This provides readers a starting point to begin iterating the ringbuffer.
- * Note that the returned sequence number might not belong to a valid record.
- *
- * Context: Any context.
- * Return: The sequence number of the first/oldest record or, if the
- * ringbuffer is empty, 0 is returned.
- */
-u64 prb_first_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
+/* Get the sequence number of the tail descriptor. */
+static u64 prb_first_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
{
struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring = &rb->desc_ring;
enum desc_state d_state;
@@ -1576,6 +1562,31 @@ bool prb_read_valid_info(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 seq,
return _prb_read_valid(rb, &seq, &r, line_count);
}
+/**
+ * prb_first_valid_seq() - Get the sequence number of the oldest available
+ * record.
+ *
+ * @rb: The ringbuffer to get the sequence number from.
+ *
+ * This is the public function available to readers to see what the
+ * first/oldest sequence number is.
+ *
+ * This provides readers a starting point to begin iterating the ringbuffer.
+ *
+ * Context: Any context.
+ * Return: The sequence number of the first/oldest record or, if the
+ * ringbuffer is empty, 0 is returned.
+ */
+u64 prb_first_valid_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb)
+{
+ u64 seq = 0;
+
+ if (!_prb_read_valid(rb, &seq, NULL, NULL))
+ return 0;
+
+ return seq;
+}
+
/**
* prb_next_seq() - Get the sequence number after the last available record.
*
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
index 711ced305cc7..3e46a7423c13 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ bool prb_read_valid(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 seq,
bool prb_read_valid_info(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb, u64 seq,
struct printk_info *info, unsigned int *line_count);
-u64 prb_first_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb);
+u64 prb_first_valid_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb);
u64 prb_next_seq(struct printk_ringbuffer *rb);
#endif /* _KERNEL_PRINTK_RINGBUFFER_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-09 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-07 14:59 [PATCH v4 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer John Ogness
2020-07-07 14:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] crash: add VMCOREINFO macro to define offset in a struct declared by typedef John Ogness
2020-07-07 14:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] printk: add lockless ringbuffer John Ogness
2020-07-07 14:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Revert "printk: lock/unlock console only for new logbuf entries" John Ogness
2020-07-08 14:34 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-09 1:20 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-07 14:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] printk: use the lockless ringbuffer John Ogness
2020-07-07 19:25 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-08 13:18 ` John Ogness
2020-07-08 14:35 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-08 19:24 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-09 7:14 ` [printk] 18a2dc6982: ltp.kmsg01.fail kernel test robot
2020-07-09 8:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-09 10:14 ` John Ogness
2020-07-09 10:59 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-09 11:13 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-09 11:17 ` John Ogness [this message]
2020-07-09 12:25 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-09 13:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-07-09 14:41 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-08 15:20 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] printk: replace ringbuffer Petr Mladek
2020-07-09 7:03 ` John Ogness
2020-07-10 9:11 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-10 9:52 ` John Ogness
2020-07-10 14:15 ` Petr Mladek
2020-07-14 2:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zh89kkek.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox