From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-arch\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] qrwlock: A queue read/write lock implementation
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:16:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjnxlxtg.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131218194615.GG16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:46:15 +0100")
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:38:29AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> (maybe it would be time to get rid of the patchable LOCK though?)
>
> With the argument that Intel simply doesn't ship UP chips anymore, with
> the exception of quark which should probably run custom UP kernels due
> to size constraints anyway?
That, and:
- Anything with a single core only has very fast LOCK
- LOCK generally became much faster everywhere.
- The original reason was for single cpu VM guests, but even those
should increasingly have at least two VCPUs.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 19:04 [PATCH v7 0/4] qrwlock: Introducing a queue read/write lock implementation Waiman Long
2013-11-22 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] qrwlock: A " Waiman Long
2013-11-22 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-22 20:35 ` Waiman Long
2013-11-22 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-12-17 19:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-17 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-12-17 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 18:51 ` Waiman Long
2013-12-18 19:38 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-18 19:42 ` Andi Kleen
2013-12-18 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-18 20:16 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2013-12-18 18:45 ` Waiman Long
2013-12-18 18:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-12-18 19:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-22 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] qrwlock x86: Enable x86 to use queue read/write lock Waiman Long
2013-12-17 19:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-22 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions for MCS queuing Waiman Long
2013-12-17 19:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-22 19:04 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock() Waiman Long
2013-12-17 19:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zjnxlxtg.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox