From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
xi.wang@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result'
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:13:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjsu5uy1.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806144339.182beb0a2abddc0782015487@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 6 Aug 2013 14:43:39 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>
>> Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
>> clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
>
> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
>
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> foo = alloc(...);
> if (!foo)
> goto out;
>
> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
>
> foo = alloc(...);
> if (!foo) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> }
>
> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
> life of me I can't remember why :(
Because doing the assignment outside of the if() goto . Allows the
compiler to emit the if() goto as a single branch.
While a smart compiler may perform the code motion across the branch,
it is much easier for the compiler to branch to somewhere else perform
the assignment and then branch out.
Eric
> Your patch switches from old-style to new-style. And it appears to
> have increased the text size. I did this, to switch three sites back
> to old-style:
>
> --- a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c~kernel-sysctl_binaryc-improve-the-usage-of-return-value-result-fix
> +++ a/kernel/sysctl_binary.c
> @@ -941,17 +941,15 @@ static ssize_t bin_string(struct file *f
> copied = result;
> lastp = oldval + copied - 1;
>
> - if (get_user(ch, lastp)) {
> - result = -EFAULT;
> + result = -EFAULT;
> + if (get_user(ch, lastp))
> goto out;
> - }
>
> /* Trim off the trailing newline */
> if (ch == '\n') {
> - if (put_user('\0', lastp)) {
> - result = -EFAULT;
> + result = -EFAULT;
> + if (put_user('\0', lastp))
> goto out;
> - }
> copied -= 1;
> }
> }
> @@ -976,11 +974,10 @@ static ssize_t bin_intvec(struct file *f
> char *buffer;
> ssize_t result;
>
> + result = -ENOMEM;
> buffer = kmalloc(BUFSZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!buffer) {
> - result = -ENOMEM;
> + if (!buffer)
> goto out;
> - }
>
> if (oldval && oldlen) {
> unsigned __user *vec = oldval;
> _
>
> and kernel/sysctl_binary.o's .text got six bytes smaller.
>
> Now, smaller text doesn't mean faster code. But it probably means
> larger cache footprint, which can mean slower code.
>
> IOW, it isn't obvious that this was an improvement.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-06 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 7:29 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result' Chen Gang
2013-08-06 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-06 22:11 ` Joe Perches
2013-08-07 3:53 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-06 22:13 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2013-08-07 5:28 ` Chen Gang F T
2013-08-07 5:11 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-06 21:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07 5:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 5:56 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 6:10 ` Joe Perches
2013-08-07 6:29 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 6:42 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 6:42 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 6:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 6:24 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-07 6:34 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 7:02 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 8:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 8:44 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 9:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 7:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 18:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-08 3:19 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zjsu5uy1.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox