public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: ppc64 module CRC relocation fix causes perf issues
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 14:09:49 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zjto1lnu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130715140450.573aab15@kryten>

Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> writes:
> Module CRCs are implemented as absolute symbols that get resolved by
> a linker script. We build an intermediate .o that contains an
> unresolved symbol for each CRC. genksysms parses this .o, calculates
> the CRCs and writes a linker script that "resolves" the symbols to
> the calculated CRC.
>
> Unfortunately the ppc64 relocatable kernel sees these CRCs as symbols
> that need relocating and relocates them at boot. Commit d4703aef
> (module: handle ppc64 relocating kcrctabs when CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y)
> added a hook to reverse the bogus relocations. Part of this patch
> created a symbol at 0x0:
>
> # head -2 /proc/kallsyms 
> 0000000000000000 T reloc_start
> c000000000000000 T .__start
>
> This reloc_start symbol is causing lots of confusion to perf. It
> thinks reloc_start is a massive function that stretches from 0x0 to
> 0xc000000000000000 and we get various cryptic errors out of perf,
> including:
>
> problem incrementing symbol count, skipping event
>
> This patch removes the  reloc_start linker script label and instead
> defines it as PHYSICAL_START. We also need to wrap it with
> CONFIG_PPC64 because the ppc32 kernel can set a non zero
> PHYSICAL_START at compile time and we wouldn't want to subtract
> it from the CRCs in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> Cc: <stable@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Ben?

Cheers,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-15  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-15  4:04 [PATCH] module: ppc64 module CRC relocation fix causes perf issues Anton Blanchard
2013-07-15  4:39 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-07-15  8:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-16 22:40   ` Scott Wood
2013-07-17  0:04     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-17  0:08       ` Scott Wood
2013-07-18  4:00         ` Anton Blanchard
2013-07-19 22:59           ` Scott Wood
2013-07-23 13:30             ` Michael Ellerman
2013-07-24 19:22               ` Scott Wood
2013-07-24 22:34             ` Anton Blanchard
2013-07-24 23:14               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-07-25 13:02                 ` Neil Horman
2013-07-26  1:19                   ` Anton Blanchard
2013-07-26 13:11                     ` Neil Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zjto1lnu.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox