From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:35:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zko3dn4b.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201103270058.41632.rjw@sisk.pl> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Sun, 27 Mar 2011 00:58:41 +0100")
Hi Rafael, Magnus,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
>
> Remove the __weak definitions of platform bus type runtime PM
> callbacks, make platform_dev_pm_ops point to the generic routines
> as appropriate and allow architectures using platform_dev_pm_ops to
> replace the runtime PM callbacks in that structure with their own
> set.
>
> Convert architectures providing its own definitions of the platform
> runtime PM callbacks to use the new mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
I dont't think we should be adding yet another new interface for setting
platform-specific runtime PM ops.
We now have 3. Two existing ones:
1) new device power domains (presumably preferred)
2) platform_bus_set_pm_ops() (disliked by many)
and now the new one you create here
3) platform_set_runtime_pm_ops()
This new one is basically the same as platform_bus_set_pm_ops(), but
targetted only at runtime PM ops, and also has all the same problems
that have been discussed before. Namely, it overrides the pm ops for
*every* device on the platform_bus, instead of targetting only specific
devices. With the new device power domains, we can target specific
devices.
Wouldn't the right way to go here be to convert mach-shmobile over to
using device power domains?
The patch below against v2.6.39-rc2 combined with your patch (minus the
mach-shmobile/* changes) should do it.
Magnus, care to test?
If SH-mobile is converted to use device powerdomains, not only can we
drop this new platform_set_runtime_pm_ops(), but we can also drop
platform_bus_set_pm_ops() (I have a patch for this as soon as I post
the OMAP conversions to device power domains.)
That will leave only a single interface for overriding the runtime PM
ops: device power domains. Personally, I prefer that as it's flexible
enough, and also allows platforms to target only specific devices
instead of the whole bus.
Kevin
>From c8176cdb019ebbb055d70212b7d69c778d3b4b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:25:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: sh-mobile: runtime PM: convert to device powerdomains
Remove the deprecated use of weak platform_bus symbols in favor of using
the new device power domains.
Cc: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm_runtime.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm_runtime.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm_runtime.c
index 94912d3..6c75c3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm_runtime.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/pm_runtime.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void platform_pm_runtime_bug(struct device *dev,
dev_err(dev, "runtime pm suspend before resume\n");
}
-int platform_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+static int platform_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_runtime_data *prd = __to_prd(dev);
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int platform_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-int platform_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+static int platform_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_runtime_data *prd = __to_prd(dev);
@@ -98,12 +98,20 @@ int platform_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
-int platform_pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
+static int platform_pm_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
{
/* suspend synchronously to disable clocks immediately */
return pm_runtime_suspend(dev);
}
+static struct dev_power_domain platform_pm_power_domain = {
+ .ops = {
+ .runtime_suspend = platform_pm_runtime_suspend,
+ .runtime_resume = platform_pm_runtime_resume,
+ .runtime_idle = platform_pm_runtime_idle,
+ },
+};
+
static int platform_bus_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long action, void *data)
{
@@ -114,10 +122,12 @@ static int platform_bus_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_BIND_DRIVER) {
prd = devres_alloc(__devres_release, sizeof(*prd), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (prd)
+ if (prd) {
devres_add(dev, prd);
- else
+ dev->pwr_domain = &platform_pm_power_domain;
+ } else {
dev_err(dev, "unable to alloc memory for runtime pm\n");
+ }
}
return 0;
--
1.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-06 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-26 23:58 [RFC][PATCH] PM / Platform: Remove __weak definitions of runtime PM callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-28 11:05 ` Magnus Damm
2011-03-28 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-05 7:17 ` Magnus Damm
2011-04-06 4:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-03-29 3:13 ` Paul Mundt
2011-04-06 22:35 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-04-07 5:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 5:48 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 6:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-04-07 7:09 ` Grant Likely
2011-04-07 5:44 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zko3dn4b.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).