From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756968Ab0EZQif (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 12:38:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:49858 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751749Ab0EZQid (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2010 12:38:33 -0400 To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: James Bottomley , Pekka Enberg , Arve =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hj=F8nnev=E5g?= , Florian Mickler , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Alan Stern , Dmitry Torokhov , Linux-pm mailing list , Kernel development list , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Cornelia Huck , Tejun Heo , Jesse Barnes , Nigel Cunningham , Ming Lei , Wu Fengguang , Maxim Levitsky , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett , Greg KH , tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] PM: Opportunistic suspend support. References: <201005252344.37639.rjw@sisk.pl> <1274863342.5882.4850.camel@twins> <20100526112303.3fef15a4@schatten.dmk.lab> <1274866402.5882.5051.camel@twins> <1274868384.5882.5169.camel@twins> <1274869262.5882.5222.camel@twins> <1274890736.4467.574.camel@mulgrave.site> <1274891308.1674.1766.camel@laptop> From: Kevin Hilman Organization: Deep Root Systems, LLC Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:38:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1274891308.1674.1766.camel@laptop> (Peter Zijlstra's message of "Wed\, 26 May 2010 18\:28\:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87zkzmoby2.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Zijlstra writes: > Anyway, I think there's been enough arguments against even the concept > of opportunistic/auto-suspend, and I for one will object with a NAK if > Rafael send this to Linus. It's already been submitted to Linus for 2.6.35, but not on LKML: https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-May/025811.html Kevin