public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: "linux-ext4\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alan Piszcz <ap@solarrain.com>
Subject: Re: EXT4 is ~2X as slow as XFS (593MB/s vs 304MB/s) for writes?
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:46:39 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zl2vsdxs.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1002261922010.8247@p34.internal.lan> (Justin Piszcz's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2010 03:31:02 +0300")

Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to 'optimize' ext4 so it is as fast as XFS for writes?
> I see about half the performance as XFS for sequential writes.
>
> I have checked the doc and tried several options, a few of which are shown
> below (I have also tried the commit/journal_async/etc options but none of 
> them get the write speeds anywhere near XFS)?
>
> Sure 'dd' is not a real benchmark, etc, etc, but with 10Gbps between 2 
> hosts I get 550MiB/s+ on reads from EXT4 but only 100-200MiB/s write.
>
> When it was XFS I used to get 400-600MiB/s for writes for the same RAID 
> volume.
>
> How do I 'speed' up ext4?  Is it possible?
I don't know how to speedup, but i do know how to slowdown XFS :)
Seems that you forget to call fsync at the end of file write
In this case some data may reside in memory cache.
Please add  "conv=fsync" or "conv=fdatasync" to the dd cmd.
And redone your measurements.
>
> raid0_11 disks: (XFS)
> # /dev/md0        /r1             xfs     noatime         0       1
> p63:/r1# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile1 bs=1M count=10240
> 10240+0 records in
> 10240+0 records out
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 18.1021 s, 593 MB/s
> p63:/r1#
>
> raid0_11 disks: (EXT4)
> # /dev/md0        /r1             ext4     noatime         0       1
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1M count=10240
> 10240+0 records in
> 10240+0 records out
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 35.3741 s, 304 MB/s
> p63:/r1#
>
> Other tests (ext4)
> p63:~# mount /dev/md0 /r1 -o data=writeback
> p63:~# cd /r1
> p63:/r1# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1M count=10240
> 10240+0 records in
> 10240+0 records out
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 39.8746 s, 269 MB/s
> p63:/r1#
>
> p63:~# mount /dev/md0 /r1 -o data=writeback,nobarrier
> p63:/r1# dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1M count=10240
> 10240+0 records in
> 10240+0 records out
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 40.0656 s, 268 MB/s
>
> Justin.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-27  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-27  0:31 EXT4 is ~2X as slow as XFS (593MB/s vs 304MB/s) for writes? Justin Piszcz
2010-02-27  0:46 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2010-02-27  1:05   ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-28  0:56     ` Asdo
2010-02-28  9:59       ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-27  0:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-27  1:08   ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-27  1:12     ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-27  1:28       ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-27 10:14         ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-27 10:51           ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-27 11:09             ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-27 11:36               ` Justin Piszcz
2010-02-28  5:42                 ` tytso
2010-02-28 14:55                   ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-01  8:39                     ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-01  9:21                       ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-01 14:48                         ` Michael Tokarev
2010-03-01 15:07                           ` Justin Piszcz
2010-03-01 16:15                     ` Eric Sandeen
2010-02-28 23:50                 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-02  0:08 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-03-02  0:37   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zl2vsdxs.fsf@openvz.org \
    --to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=ap@solarrain.com \
    --cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox