From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262686AbUBIPvI (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:51:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262687AbUBIPvH (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:51:07 -0500 Received: from [212.5.174.154] ([212.5.174.154]:28363 "EHLO zelcom.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262686AbUBIPvD (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:51:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:46:29 +0300 Message-ID: <87znbsxnl6.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> From: Samium Gromoff To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Nick Piggin , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [TEST] 2.4 vs 2.6.2 vs 2.6.2-mm1 vs 2.6.2-rc3-mm1 In-Reply-To: <873c9kz4et.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> References: <873c9kz4et.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:57:46 +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote: [snip] > the kernels were: > 2.4.20-pre9, 2.6.2 -- no comments > 2.6.2-rc3-mm1 -- that one didn`t include the Namesys VM patches > 2.6.2--mm1 -- that one _did_ include the Namesys VM patches Small correction -- these are not exactly the Namesys patches, they are from Nick Piggin (http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/vm/), and some are certainly based on the Namesys folks` work... [snip] > regards, Samium Gromoff